As India’s dynamic capital and commercial powerhouse, Delhi presents unparalleled opportunities for entrepreneurs looking to invest in profitable franchise ventures. With a staggering Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) of $272.603 billion, Delhi ranks among the top economic contributors in the country, making it an ideal destination for business growth.
What makes Delhi/NCR particularly attractive for entrepreneurs is its unique blend of affluence, infrastructure, and consumer appetite. The region boasts one of India’s highest per capita incomes, fueling strong purchasing power. This thriving services sector contributes a staggering 84% to its GSDP, world-class urban infrastructure, including metro connectivity, commercial hubs, and logistics networks, and a young, aspirational population eager to embrace branded products and services.
If you are looking for the best franchises to start in Delhi/NCR, here are 18 high-growth franchise opportunities across different sectors.
Top Profitable Franchise Opportunities in Delhi/NCR
Are you looking to start your own business in Delhi/NCR? Here is the list of great 18 franchise options that can help you grow fast. The brands listed here are ideal for getting your business off to a strong start in 2025!
Apollo Health and Lifestyle Limited (AHLL) is a key part of the Apollo Hospitals Group and is based in Hyderabad. It launched Apollo Clinics back in 2002. AHLLâs mission is simple yet powerful: to make top-quality healthcare accessible to everyone. AHLL has been setting up a wide network of Apollo Clinics across India, bringing world-class healthcare closer to home for countless families to make this vision a reality.
Gianiâs Ice Cream
Founded
1956
Area Required
80â400 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 12 Lakhs Onwards
Number of Franchise Outlets
300+
Gianiâs – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Gianiâs, a premium ice cream brand since 1956, is renowned for its authentic taste and wide variety of flavors. With over 300 stores across India, Gianiâs offers a low-investment, high-demand business opportunity. Franchisees benefit from strong brand recognition and comprehensive support, including site selection, store setup, marketing, and training.
Delhi Academy of Medical Sciences (DAMS) – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
DAMS is a premier institute for medical entrance coaching, offering classes for NEET, AIIMS, and PG medical exams. With a strong presence across India, DAMS provides franchise opportunities for those interested in the education sector.
Maple Bear Canadian Pre-school
Founded
2004
Area Required
4000 Sq. ft onwards
Investment Size
INR 20â30 Lakhs
Number of Franchise Outlets
600
Maple Bear Canadian Pre-school – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Maple Bear brings Canadian early childhood education to India, offering a bilingual immersion program. With over 400 schools worldwide, Maple Bear provides a franchise model with comprehensive training, curriculum support, and marketing assistance.
Foster Kids
Founded
2003
Area Required
6000 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 6 Lakhs Onwards
Number of Franchise Outlets
250
Foster Kids – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Foster Kids is a preschool chain that commenced operations in 2003 and started franchising in 2005. With a focus on early childhood education, Foster Kids offers a low-investment franchise opportunity with an anticipated 100% return on investment and a likely payback period of 1â2 years.
Monginis
Founded
1956
Area Required
200â500 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 10â15 Lakhs
Number of Franchise Outlets
100+
Monginis – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Monginis is an Indian multinational pastry and bakery chain based in Mumbai, with outlets across India and Egypt. Known for its cakes, pastries, and savory snacks, Monginis offers a franchise model with no royalty fees and comprehensive support in bakery setup, staff training, and marketing.
Sankalp Group, originating from Ahmedabad, is a chain of specialty restaurants offering South Indian cuisine. Sankalp provides a franchise model with comprehensive support, including site selection, training, and marketing, with over 200 restaurants globally.
VLCC Healthcare
Founded
1989
Area Required
800â2200 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 40â80 Lakhs
Number of Franchise Outlets
100+
VLCC Healthcare – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
VLCC is a renowned wellness brand offering services in weight management, beauty, and fitness. The franchise model includes comprehensive support in site selection, staff recruitment, training, and marketing. Investment varies based on the type of center (Slimming, Salon, or Wellness Center).
Karimâs
Founded
1913
Area Required
600 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 22 Lakhs Onwards
Number of Franchise Outlets
100+
Karim’s – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Vidyamandir Classes (VMC) is a premier coaching institute for engineering and medical entrance exams like JEE and NEET. With a strong legacy and proven teaching methodologies, VMC offers franchise opportunities with comprehensive support in academics, marketing, and operations.
Delhivery is a leading logistics and supply chain services company in India. Their franchise model includes options for courier booking and delivery services, with low initial investment and support in technology and operations.
Kathi Junction
Founded
2009
Area Required
300â600 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 20â30 Lakhs
Number of Franchise Outlets
Multiple across India
Kathi Junction – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Kathi Junction specializes in a variety of Kathi rolls, kebabs, and other fast-food items. With a focus on quality and taste, they offer franchise models suitable for food courts, dine-in, and express outlets.
Snakkers
Founded
2015
Area Required
1000â2000 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 25 Lakhs onwards
Number of Franchise Outlets
100â200
Snakkers – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Snakkers is a vibrant quick-service restaurant (QSR) brand that offers a variety of fast-food favourites. Known for its consistent taste and attractive pricing, Snakkers has carved a niche in the competitive QSR market. Franchisees benefit from the brandâs extensive experience, reliable supply chain, and strategic marketing support, ensuring a smooth and profitable venture.
Mega Mart Ventures
Founded
2019
Area Required
500â5000 Sq. ft
Investment Size
INR 10â20 Lakhs
Number of Franchise Outlets
100â200
Mega Mart Ventures – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Mega Mart Ventures is among Indiaâs leading supermarket franchise chains, offering a diverse range of products at competitive prices. Their well-structured franchise model includes comprehensive support for store setup, training, inventory management, and promotions. Ideal for entrepreneurs looking to tap into the ever-growing FMCG sector, Mega Mart Ventures ensures strong returns and scalability.
Chicago Pizza is a leading pizza chain in India, famous for its single-slice pizzas and custom toppings. Its franchise model is designed for flexibility, offering formats from kiosks to dine-in spaces, making it accessible to diverse entrepreneurs.
Moti Mahal
Established
2010
Franchise Investment
INR 20 Lakhs onwards
Area Required
400 Sq. ft onwards
Franchise Outlets
100
Moti Mahal – Best Franchises to Start in Delhi
Moti Mahal is a legendary name that brought tandoori cuisine to global fame. Known for its rich flavours and iconic dishes, it offers a profitable franchise model with comprehensive support in kitchen training, ingredient sourcing, and marketing. With the growing love for North Indian cuisine, Moti Mahal franchises are primed for long-term success.
Conclusion
Delhiâs booming economy, world-class infrastructure, and affluent consumer base make it a prime destination for ambitious entrepreneurs. Whether you are looking to step into the bustling food and beverage sector or tap into the booming education and wellness markets, these 18 handpicked franchises offer low-risk, high-reward models that can turn your business dreams into reality.
A growing number of AI and deep-tech startups in India are bypassing domestic enterprise clients altogether. This trend, now popularly known as the “Skip India” movement, is being driven not by lack of ambition but by structural and systemic hurdles that stifle innovation at home. Indian founders, even those with successful track records, are increasingly shifting focus to foreign markets early in their journey, seeing more predictable, faster-moving, and innovation-receptive customers abroad. This article dives into why this trend is accelerating, what it says about India’s enterprise and innovation culture, and how it could reshape India’s tech future.
The Reality for AI Startups in India
Despite Indiaâs positioning as a global IT powerhouse and its aggressive digital public infrastructure push, most early-stage Indian AI startups are unable to find a supportive local market.
The Reality for AI Startups in India
They face a unique cocktail of challenges:
Unpaid Proofs of Concept (PoCs): Startups are routinely asked to build unpaid PoCs that demand months of work without guaranteed conversion. Unlike global counterparts that budget for innovation and are open to piloting emerging tech with budgets, many Indian enterprises treat PoCs as free trials, exhausting startup resources and morale.
Bureaucratic Sales Cycles: Enterprise sales in India involve long decision cycles, multiple gatekeepers, and unclear timelines. For startups, this burns cash and time, making India an unattractive first market. Founders cite a lack of access to key decision-makers and frequent ghosting even after initial enthusiasm.
Risk Aversion and Status Quo Bias: Indian enterprises show a strong bias for buying from established IT services firms and legacy players. Startups, especially in bleeding-edge spaces like GenAI or privacy-focused AI, struggle to convince risk-averse buyers to invest early. Even after strong demos and PoCs, buyers often default to safer, known vendors.
Lack of Strategic Capital from Enterprises: In more mature markets, enterprise clients act like strategic partners. They might be early customers, design partners, or even angel investors. In India, such deep collaborations are rare. The market views startups as vendors rather than collaborators.
Voices from the Ground
Paras Chopra, founder of Wingify and Lossfunk, publicly stated he banned his team from engaging with Indian clients. He shared that Indian clients often waste time, donât pay, and expect the impossible for free.
Vaibhav Domkundwar, founder of Better Capital, called out Indian firms for treating startups like free consulting shops. He stated on record that the culture of unpaid PoCs is actively killing the domestic AI ecosystem.
These are not isolated rants, they reflect a growing sentiment among founders who feel that the Indian enterprise ecosystem lacks the culture to nurture early innovation.
Why AI Startups are Choosing Global Markets Over India
Startups that shift focus to the US, the Middle East, or Southeast Asia find:
Faster sales closures
Better respect for IP
Paid PoC culture
Constructive feedback loops
Strategic customer partnerships
In contrast, Indiaâs digital economy, though massive, is often inaccessible to early-stage tech innovators unless they have backing from powerful networks or legacy credibility.
Loss of Localized Innovation: When startups ignore the Indian market, solutions aren’t tailored for Indian consumers or enterprises. This slows down digital transformation domestically and makes India dependent on imported AI solutions.
Brain Drain 2.0: Many founders either relocate abroad or build with foreign markets as the only target. This time, the drain isnât just talent, but IP, revenues, and eventual value creation.
Missed Opportunity for Enterprises: Indian businesses risk missing the AI wave entirely. By not engaging startups early, they lose competitive advantages and risk becoming digital laggards.
Broken Ecosystem Flywheel: Successful local exits create capital, mentors, and second-time founders. Without early traction in India, these cycles break. The startup ecosystem remains dependent on foreign buyers and venture capital.
Underlying Cultural and Systemic Issues
Transactional Mindset: Many Indian buyers approach B2B SaaS or AI products with a cost-first mindset, not a value-first one.
Innovation Theater: There’s often more talk about innovation (via hackathons, challenges, showcases) than actual paid deployments.
Lack of Internal Champions: Unlike Silicon Valley, where PMs or engineering leads can drive adoption, Indian orgs lack such evangelists who can push for startup solutions internally.
Preference for Build Over Buy: Large IT departments often try to replicate startup solutions in-house, even if inefficient.
What Needs to Change: The Way Forward
Enabling Innovation in India
Enterprises Must Pay for PoCs: If Indian corporates are serious about innovation, they must allocate budgets for experimentation and pay startups for their work. Even small pilot contracts send a strong signal of intent.
Create Innovation Sandboxes: Firms can create innovation arms or test environments where startups can plug in and demonstrate value without being blocked by compliance or bureaucracy.
CIOs and CTOs Need Mandates for External Innovation: Leadership must incentivize teams to work with startups and not just with established vendors. KPIs should track how many startups get onboarded annually.
Strategic Capital and Customer Equity: Enterprises could take equity positions in promising B2B startups they pilot with, aligning incentives and signaling seriousness.
Government and DPI Institutions Can Lead: Public institutions like NPCI, ONDC, and MeitY can set the tone by funding, piloting, and scaling solutions from Indian startups.
Conclusion: Skip India Is Not a Trend, Itâs a Symptom
The “Skip India” movement isnât just a startup complaint. Itâs a mirror to Indiaâs enterprise culture and innovation readiness. If the world’s fastest-growing tech talent base continues to look outside for validation and value, India risks being a factory for the world, but not a market. To change that, Indian enterprises must stop treating startups as vendors and start viewing them as partners in transformation.
Indiaâs future as a global innovation leader depends not just on how well it builds, but how willingly it buys from its own.
FAQs
What is the “Skip India” movement?
It refers to a growing trend where Indian AI and deep-tech startups avoid Indian enterprise clients and focus on global markets due to systemic challenges in the domestic ecosystem.
Why are Indian startups skipping the local market?
They face issues like unpaid Proofs of Concept (PoCs), long sales cycles, risk-averse clients, and a lack of strategic partnerships from Indian enterprises.
What are the consequences of skipping India?
It leads to brain drain, loss of localized innovation, and missed opportunities for Indian enterprises to leverage homegrown AI solutions.
How do global markets differ for these startups?
Startups find faster deal closures, paid PoCs, strategic collaborations, and greater respect for IP in markets like the US, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.
ââPeople’s eating habits have changed significantly, specifically because of the lockdown. People become more familiar with ordering food online from the convenience of their homes. Two players, Zomato and Swiggy, dominate the Indian food delivery industry.
âFood delivery businesses got paced during the lockdown period. According to the research report of the ETC group, Swiggy is the ninth biggest food delivery company in the world, and Zomato is the tenth biggest.
ââBoth these companies are adopting and experimenting with new things to dominate the market. So here we are with the full analysis to let you know who will win the food delivery race.
The Indian food delivery industry was valued at $156.75 billion in 2024, which is growing at a 10.7% CAGR every year and is expected to reach around $173.57 billion by 2025. Since the growth is not steady and it fluctuates depending on various factors, it is still one of the fastest-growing industries in India.
The industry has shown tremendous growth over the past couple of years. The main reasons behind the growth are as follows.
Annual Revenue of Swiggy and Zomato (FY2022 – FY2024)
Swiggy Vs Zomato: The Ultimate Comparison
Feature
Swiggy
Zomato
1. App Interface
Simple, fast, user-friendly
Fun, witty, review-rich
2. Delivery Speed
Fast & reliable
Varies, often slower
3. Pricing
More discounts, value deals
Premium rates, Pro needed
4. Market Reach
Strong in smaller cities
Dominates big metros
5. Food Options
Wide range + groceries (Instamart)
Fine dining + Blinkit partnership
6. Customer Support
Fast, helpful chat support
Slower, slightly delayed responses
7. Subscription Plans
Super: Free delivery, no surge
Pro: Dine-in perks, fewer offers
8. Marketing Style
Aggressive, influencer-driven
Witty, meme-based, community-first
Swiggy Vs Zomato: The Ultimate Comparison
Innovations of Zomato
Zomato always strives for different innovative stuff to improve customer experience. Some innovations are the next level try, which has the capabilities to disrupt the market. Let’s have a closer look at what Zomato has done so far to stay ahead in the food delivery race.
Zomato Hyperpure
Swiggy vs Zomato – Hyperpure by Zomato
ââHyperpure is one of Zomato’s initiatives to provide fresh and high-quality ingredients to restaurants. Restaurants can choose from 1200+ ingredients and kitchen products, which will be directly delivered to the restaurant’s address. Now, there is no headache for restaurant owners buying kitchen commodities for daily use.
For product outsourcing, Zomato has a network of professionals that includes farmers, mills, producers, and processors. Sellers on Hyperpure are verified and only those sellers are appointed who are looking for a long-term partnership.
10-min Delivery by Zomato Instant
Swiggy vs Zomato – 10 min Delivery by Zomato Instant
According to Zomato, sorting restaurants by delivery time is the most used feature in the app. This shows that customers want quicker delivery; they don’t want to wait. Zomato recognized this and launched Zomato Instant, which is a 10-minute food delivery service for restaurants.
ââAfter listening to Allforthis, you might think that Zomato is putting extra pressure on its delivery partners and restaurant partners, but it’s not like that. According to Zomato, their delivery partners are not informed about the promised delivery time, nor are they penalized for late delivery.
ââAll this delivery works on a demand prediction algorithm. There is a network of finishing stations located near the high-demand area for the fulfillment of each order.
Ordering legendary and famous foods from any state to your home is the concept introduced by Zomato. Now you can order biryani from Hyderabad and rasgullas from Kolkata, and they will be delivered to you the next day. ‘Intercity Legends’ is a way to enjoy iconic dishes from different cities and states.
‘Intercity Legends’ is still in the pilot stage, but the response is extremely good. It is available for selected customers in Gurgaon and some parts of South Delhi. But the innovative step taken by Zomato to bring iconic of different states to our doorstep is appreciable.
Your order reaches you via a flight with proper packaging; there is a proper logistics system designed to deliver the order to you within the given time.
Voice Instructions for Delivery Location
Mapping in India is not that precise, and sometimes, it is hard to find locations based on written delivery addresses. Zomato, which always tries to enhance user experience, brings a new feature in its app that allows users to provide voice instructions for directions to their homes.
To use this feature, you need to click on the delivery direction tab and then hold the record button to give the information related to your delivery location. This feature is helpful because sometimes delivery partners face issues in finding the delivery location, and they need to call the customer, which ultimately delays the delivery and leaves a bad taste in customer satisfaction.
Street food is the best, cheapest, and most tasty alternative we prefer over restaurants. Sometimes we are used to eating food from any street vendor and often say, ‘Chal kallu ke chhole bhature khane Chalte hai.’ These street vendors suffered a lot during the lockdown period.
Zomato, in collaboration with the Government of India, started an initiative to bring this street vendors onto its platform. The government launched the Prime Minister Street Vendor’s AtmaNirbhar Nidhi scheme (PM SVAnidhi scheme) to provide working capital loans and increase digital payments for these vendors.
So far, Zomato has onboarded approximately 965 street vendors on its platform across different cities like Vadodara, Bhopal, Nagpur, Jabalpur, and Ludhiana.
Zomato AI
Swiggy vs Zomato – Zomato AI
Zomato, a top food delivery company, has launched an AI-based customer support tool called Nugget. This new step is part of the companyâs plan to use more technology and reduce manual work. Zomato, a top food delivery company, has launched an AI-based customer support tool called Nugget. This new step is part of the companyâs plan to use more technology and reduce manual work. As a result, Zomato has let go of 600 customer support employees.
The goal of Nugget is to make customer service faster and more efficient. With AI growing quickly, more companies like Zomato are now choosing smart bots to handle customer queries instead of relying only on human staff.
This move shows Zomatoâs focus on using advanced technology to improve how they work and help customers. It also points to a big change in the food tech industry, where automation and AI are becoming the new normal for better service.
The goal of Nugget is to make customer service faster and more efficient. With AI growing quickly, more companies like Zomato are now choosing smart bots to handle customer queries instead of relying only on human staff.
This move shows Zomatoâs focus on using advanced technology to improve how they work and help customers. It also points to a big change in the food tech industry, where automation and AI are becoming the new normal for better service.
Earlier, Zomato launched something super cool called Zomato AI, and it’s like having a foodie friend in your pocket! The best part? It can do many things simultaneously, making it a multitasking food guru.
Let’s say you’re craving a specific dish. Well, Zomato AI can show you a list of all the places around you that serve exactly what you’re hankering for. And if you’re feeling indecisive about what to order, no worries! Zomato AI can suggest popular dishes or great restaurants to make your decision a breeze.
But what makes it even cooler is how you can chat with it just like you would with a friend. You can send multiple messages, and Zomato AI responds almost instantly, making the whole experience smooth and natural, unlike other AI things that only handle one message at a time. Zomato AI is like your foodie BFF, ready to help you out with any food-related question you throw at it.
Swiggy is also not behind in the race for innovation; Swiggy has taken various steps to improve its delivery services and user experience.
AI to Improve Delivery Services
Swiggy is using AI to enhance user experience across its platform. Its AI-powered neural search allows users to find food and groceries in a conversational way, offering personalized recommendations. For dining out, Swiggy is developing a generative AI-based Dineout bot that helps users discover restaurants based on their preferences. Additionally, the company is building AI-driven tools to support its network of restaurant and delivery partners, streamlining operations and improving service quality.
Swiggy is using AI technology to fill the loopholes present in the different stages of delivery. Swiggy has improved its AI to the extent that delivery executives can’t change their status to ‘Arrived’ before they reach the restaurant. Everything is connected with GPS for location tracking to ensure transparency.
Data is the fuel for today’s world, and this company is leveraging it very efficiently. AI is used for the future prediction of orders, customer behavior, and interaction with the help of previously available data.
With the help of AI, Swiggy provides a personalized list of restaurants based on your previous order, reviews, search, and interaction. It also recommends different dishes that you are most likely to order.
The first membership program launched by Swiggy was Swiggy Super in 2018, which provides free delivery on restaurant orders. Since then, Swiggy has launched different services, like Instamart and Swiggy Genie, to boost its quick commerce.
So, despite installing the different apps and using these services separately, Swiggy has integrated all these services under one roof called Swiggy One. Now, users have to install only one app, which is Swiggy, create only one account, and buy only one membership plan offered by Swiggy.
Just by using one app, users can order food from the restaurant, buy groceries using Instamart services, and deliver anything with Swiggy Genie. Benefits like discounts and free delivery can be availed by membership users.
Swiggy One
Delivery by Drone
Zomato vs Swiggy – Swiggy Delivery by Drone
The food-tech space in India is going through a revolution phase. Swiggy is working on providing delivery using drones, and multiple pilots are conducting tests to make this concept operational. The whole concept revolves around transferring the goods from the dark stores to the nearest seller location of the customer.
Garuda Aerospace commenced the first trial in Delhi-NCR and Bengaluru to use drones for grocery delivery. Based on the performance of the first trial in Bengaluru and Delhi-NCR, Swiggy will conduct a second trial with ANRA technology, Techeagle, and Marut drone tech.
Multimedia Card Insights: Enhanced User Experience
Providing a better Customer Experience is the way to build long-term trust among customers. Today, companies are doing so many things to enrich the user experience on their platforms. They know very well that a bad user experience will directly lead to a decrease in customer base.
Swiggy has launched a new innovative multimedia card insights, which is a new way to showcase the product overview. Images and Lottie animations are old; things have changed in this new era. In this new multimedia card, informative videos are used to show the product’s features.
Swiggy, the food and grocery delivery service, has introduced a new feature called Pocket Hero. It’s like a money-saving sidekick for users who want to spend smart. It’s being tested in Delhi, giving you extra cashback and discounts of up to 60% on food orders from specific restaurants. You can enjoy these benefits at five places: Pink Box, 34 Chowringhee Lane, Cold Love Ice Cream, The Chai Story, and Chai Chapter.
âPockethero aims to make food delivery accessible to a set of users who today may find online food delivery less value for money … Pockethero delivers the best of discounts from our partner restaurants and gives free delivery on top of it to give our customers a taste of convenience without having to think much about their pockets,” said Sidharth Bhakoo, VP, National Business Head at Swiggy.
Figure Overview: Zomato vs Swiggy
Zomato Vs Swiggy
Facts
Zomato (Eternal Ltd)
Swiggy
Number of Restaurants
~3.14 lakh partners
2.5 lakh+ partners
Cities Covered
800+ cities
700+ cities
App Downloads
100 million+
100 million+
Number of Employees
7,331 employees
5,401 employees
Revenue (FY24)
INR 7792 crore
INR 6082 crore
Total Funding Raised
$3.4 billion
$3.8 billion
Google App Rating
4.7 / 5
4.4 / 5
Marketing of Zomato
Zomato’s top-notch marketing strategy always supports its presence in the market. The food delivery industry has never been so interesting, but things have changed now. Let’s have a look at some of the popular marketing of Zomato.
Zomaland
Swiggy vs Zomato – Zomaland by Zomato
Zomaland is a carnival consisting of the best restaurants, powerful performances, amazing attractions, and a plethora of other events, making this a food festival.
Started in 2019, this food carnival of Zomato became successful by hosting 1.5 lakh+ visitors, 300+ restaurants, and serving more than 3.5 lakh dishes. Many famous artists like Badshah, Hardy Sandhu, Divine, and many more were reported to perform in order to entertain the visitors.
Now, Zomaland season 2 has arrived with full energy in cities like Pune, Ahmedabad, Mumbai, New Delhi, Kolkata, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad. This marketing event by Zomato is one of the most popular and successful.
Meme and Creative Marketing
Swiggy vs Zomato – Zomato Creative Marketing
Meme and creative marketing of Zomato are the best in the industry. If you look at the social media handle, you will find so many creative marketing memes that connect with the audience and, interestingly, convey the message.
Paid Advertising Campaigns
While paid advertising is typically a short-term marketing approach, its impact on maintaining engagement cannot be overlooked. Zomato strategically utilizes paid advertising, complementing its organic optimization efforts to enhance brand visibility in search results. The key to Zomato’s advertising lies in audience retention.
Employing Google Ads, Zomato precisely targets specific customer segments. These paid ads, seamlessly integrated with organic results, enable the brand to reach a broad spectrum of keywords that might be challenging through organic efforts alone. Zomato’s marketing campaigns predominantly involve paid advertisements, serving as a proactive means to connect and sustain engagement with their audience.
Marketing of Swiggy
Zomato vs Swiggy – Why is This a Swiggy Ad?
The marketing campaign is an integral part of Swiggy; it gives neck-to-neck competition to its biggest rival, Zomato. Swiggy’s recently launched marketing campaign is the best example of it.
Why is this a Swiggy ad? It is a marketing campaign introduced by Swiggy in which you have to answer, ‘Why is this a Swiggy ad?’ After looking at the picture published by Swiggy.
This marketing move grabbed the attention of many customers because of the challenge they had given. Swiggy also announced Rupees 1 lakh worth of Swiggy money to the person who gave the right answer.
Approximately 800,000 people participated online with their theories behind the campaign, making it one of the most successful Swiggy user-generated campaigns. The question “Why is this a Swiggy ad?” was one of the most searched topics on Google that week.
Email and Social Media Marketing
Zomato vs Swiggy – Email and Social Media Marketing
Regularly engaging with its customer base, Swiggy employs dynamic email campaigns featuring captivating graphics, catchy slogans, and irresistible deals. The brand strategically enhances its email content, especially during major events like the Indian Premier League, the World Cup, and the Olympics, entertaining and ensuring relevance and heightened consumer interest during these periods.
Across various social media platforms, Swiggy maintains a robust presence. Their innovative use of hashtags, such as #EarnYourCheatMeal, #NoOrderTooSmall, and #EatYourVeggies, exemplifies the brand’s creativity in connecting with its audience. Swiggy leverages humor in posts, cleverly weaving current trends into content that entertains and aligns with the company’s services and vision. This multi-faceted approach reflects Swiggy’s commitment to staying dynamic, entertaining, and closely connected to its customers.
PPC Advertising Strategy
Swiggy, the big food delivery company, is good at using online ads. They choose specific words (like “food delivery near me”) that people often type when looking for food. They also use catchy phrases for specific cravings, like “midnight chicken delivery.” Swiggy shows its ads to the right people by avoiding words that don’t match, like “homemade food.”
Their short and clear ads talk about quick delivery and good deals. They create a feeling of urgency, like saying, “Order now!” Swiggy makes ordering easy by designing its website and app to be simple and quick, especially on phones. They even suggest dishes based on what you might like. Swiggy doesn’t use the same ads everywhere; they change them for Google, Facebook, and others, depending on where people are looking. They also test different ads to see what works best and keep improving. Swiggy also does things like reminding people about their orders or making special holiday ads. They work with popular restaurants and influencers to reach more people and make their brand trustworthy.
Conclusion
In the competitive landscape of food delivery services, the Swiggy vs Zomato comparison reveals interesting dynamics. Both companies excel in delivering quality food, but Zomato currently holds a stronger position in terms of market share, marketing strategies, innovation, and successful acquisitions. On the flip side, Swiggy takes the lead in prioritizing the well-being of its delivery executives, a crucial factor contributing to heightened consumer satisfaction. Zomato or Swiggy which is better, depends on what you preferâfaster delivery and groceries with Swiggy, or detailed reviews and a fun app with Zomato. The Swiggy vs Zomato debate showcases the nuanced strengths of each, with Zomato dominating certain business aspects while Swiggy takes a commendable lead in ensuring the welfare of its delivery workforce.
FAQs
What are the top 3 food delivery apps?
The top 3 food delivery apps in India are Zomato, Swiggy, and Domino’s.
Is Swiggy successful in India?
Yes, Swiggy is considered a successful startup in India. Regardless of its rough path, it has successfully created a great example in the market for other startups to learn from.
Swiggy or Zomato which is best?
Choosing between Zomato and Swiggy depends on your priorities. Zomato shines in restaurant discovery and reviews, while Swiggy excels in delivery speed and interface. Ultimately, the “best” depends on what matters most to you: food research or swift delivery.
Is Swiggy losing to Zomato?
As for the insights shared by Jefferies, the gross value of Swiggy’s food delivery operation in the first half of 2022 was $1.3 billion, whereas Zomato recorded $1.6 billion of the order value for its food delivery operations. From this, it can be estimated that Swiggy has lagged at several points to Zomato. However, the real winner is still a debatable topic.
Is Swiggy ahead of Zomato?
Both companies are fierce in their competition. When we talk about gross value, Swiggy lagged behind Zomato. However, with the acquisition of a quick commerce platform, Blinkit, Swiggy crossed Zomato in the quick commerce space to capture all e-commerce markets and move ahead of Zomato.
Starbucks Corporation is an American coffee chain that was established in 1971 in Seattle, Washington. By 2023, the organization had a presence in over 38,000 areas around the world. Starbucks has been depicted as the fundamental delegate of “second wave espresso,” a reflectively-named development that advanced high-quality espresso and specially simmered coffee. Starbucks now uses robotized coffee machines for proficiency and well-being.
Starbucks serves hot and cold beverages, entire bean espresso, micro-ground moment espresso known as VIA, coffee, caffe latte, full-and free leaf teas such as Teavana tea products, Evolution Fresh squeezes, Frappuccino refreshments, La Boulange baked goods, and bites (for example, chips and wafers); some offerings such as the Pumpkin Spice Latte are explicit to the territory of the store. Numerous Starbucks outlets sell pre-bundled nourishment items, sweltering and cold sandwiches, and drinkware such as cups and tumblers. Furthermore, there are Select “Starbucks Evenings” areas that offer brew, wine, and appetizers.
Starbucks first ended up productive in Seattle in the mid-1980s. Despite an underlying financial downturn with its venture into the Midwest and British Columbia in the late 1980s, the organization experienced rejuvenated success with its entrance into California in the mid-1990s. Starbucks opened an average of two new stores every day between 1987 and 2007.
Brian Niccol is the current CEO of Starbucks, a role which he started on September 9, 2024. Before Niccol, Indian-American Laxman Narasimhan served as the CEO of Starbucks.
This article is a case study of Starbucks with Starbucks Startup Story, its presence in India, business strategy, future plans, and more.
Starbucks – Company Highlights
Startup Name
Starbucks
Headquarters
Seattle, Washington, United States
Sector
Food and Beverage, Hospitality
Founders
Gordon Bowker, Jerry Baldwin, Zev Siegl
Founded
1971
Valuation
$108.84 billion (September 2024)
Revenue
$35.98 billion (FY23)
Parent Organization
Joint Venture Company of Tata Consumer Products and Starbucks Corporation
If you are wondering how did Starbucks start? Then, the story of Starbucks started when the company was a roaster and retailer of whole bean and ground coffee, tea, and spices with a single store in Seattleâs Pike Place Market. Gordon Bowker, Jerry Baldwin, and Zev Siegl founded Starbucks in 1971.
Zev Siegl stated that at that time he knew the coffee industry inside and out, he was well-versed, especially with the gourmet end of the industry. Besides, he was also known as the most educated coffee guy in the country at that time. So, the three college friends – Zev Siegl, Jerry Baldwin, and Gordon, started with their coffee bean shop and roastery at Seattleâs famous Pike Place Market in 1971. Eventually, they found a mentor in Alfred Peet, who was the founder of Peetâs Coffee and the man responsible for bringing custom coffee roasting to the U.S., and started with the coffee business in full swing. Starbucks initially began by selling coffee beans that were roasted by Peet’s, a gourmet coffee company in Berkeley, California, and later on, started roasting on their own.
Starbucks – History
The first Starbucks store was initiated in 1971 in Washington by 3 individuals who met while they were studying at the University of San Francisco: English educator Hun Baldwin, history educator Zev Siegl, and author Gordon Bowker. The trio was encouraged to sell top-notch espresso beans and hardware after businessman Alfred Peet showed them his style of simmering beans.
During this time, the organization sold simmered, entire espresso beans. During its first year of activity, Starbucks bought green espresso beans from Peet’s and then started purchasing legitimately from producers.
Starbucks – Name and Logo
Starbucks Logo
Bowker reviews that Terry Heckler, with whom Bowker claimed a publicizing office, thought words starting with “st” were ground-breaking. The organizers conceptualized a rundown of words starting with “st” and in the long run arrived at “Strabo,” a mining town in the Cascade Range. The team then finalized “Starbucks,” the name of the young chief mate in the book “Moby-Dick”.
Starbucks has given too many slogans/taglines already among which the most popular one is – “Brewed for those who love coffee”.
Starbucks – Expansion Journey
Number of Starbucks Stores Worldwide (2003-2024)
In 1984, the first proprietors of Starbucks, driven by Jerry Baldwin, acquired Peet’s. During the 1980s, all-out offers of espresso in the US were falling. However, offers of strength espresso expanded, shaping 10% of the market in 1989; it stood at just 3% in terms of market share in 1983. By 1986, the organization worked six stores in Seattle and had just barely started to sell coffee.
In 1987, the first proprietors sold the Starbucks chain to the previous manager Howard Schultz, who rebranded his II Giornale espresso outlets as Starbucks and immediately extended. Starbucks then launched its outlets outside Seattle at Waterfront Station in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Chicago, Illinois. By 1989, 46 stores existed over the Northwest and Midwest, and every year Starbucks was simmering more than 2,000,000 pounds (907,185 kg) of coffee. At the hour of its first sale of stock (IPO) on the financial exchange in June 1992, Starbucks had 140 outlets with an income of $73.5 million, up from $1.3 million in 1987.
The organization’s fairly estimated worth was $271 million at this point. The 12% segment of the organization that was sold raised around $25 million for the organization, which encouraged a multiplying of the number of stores throughout the following two years. By September 1992, Starbucks’ offer cost had ascended by 70% to more than multiple times the income per portion of the past year. In July 2013, over 10% of in-store buys were made on the client’s cell phones utilizing the Starbucks app.
The organization used the versatile social media stage when it propelled the “Tweet-a-Coffee” campaign in October 2013. People had the option to buy a $5 gift voucher for a companion by entering both “@tweetacoffee” and the companion’s handle in a tweet. Research firm Keyhole observed the advancement of the event and a media article from December 2013 detailed that Starbucks had discovered that 27,000 individuals had taken an interest and $180,000 of buys were made to date.
Starbucks Expansion Around The World
As of 2023, Starbucks is positioned 137th on the Fortune 500 rundown of the biggest United States organizations by revenue.
In July 2019, Starbucks announced a “monetary second from last quarter total compensation of $1.37 billion, or $1.12 per share, up from $852.5 million, or 61 pennies for each offer, a year sooner.” The organization’s fairly estimated worth of $110.2 billion expanded by 41% in the middle of 2019. The income per share in quarter three was recorded at 78 pennies, considerably more than the estimate of 72 cents.
In January 2011, Starbucks Corporation and Tata Coffee reported designs to start opening Starbucks outlets in India. Despite a bogus beginning in 2007, in January 2012, Starbucks declared a 50:50 joint endeavor with Tata Global Beverages, called Tata Starbucks Ltd., which would possess and work outlets marked “Starbucks, A Tata Alliance”. Starbucks endeavored to enter the Indian market in 2007. However, it didn’t provide any explanation behind its withdrawal of it.
It was on October 19, 2012, that Starbucks opened its first store, a 4,500 sq ft store in Elphinstone Building, Horniman Circle, Mumbai. Starbucks opened its first cooking and bundling plant in Coorg, Karnataka in 2013 to supply its Indian outlets. The company extended its reach to Delhi on 24 January 2013 by opening 2 outlets. Tata Global Beverages declared in 2013 that they would have 50 areas before the end of the year, with a venture of INR 4 billion. The organization did open its 50th store in India on July 8, 2014.
The third city in India to get a Starbucks outlet was Pune, where the organization opened an outlet at Koregaon Park on 8 September 2013. Starbucks opened a 3,000-square-foot lead store at Koramangala, Bangalore on 22 November 2013, making it the fourth city to have an outlet. Starbucks opened the biggest espresso-forward store in the nation at Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore on 18 March 2019. The store is estimated at 3,000 sq ft and is Starbucks’ 140th outlet in India.
Tata Starbucks opened 25 stores between 2017 and 2018, which went up to 30 during 2018-19. On 21 February 2019, CEO Navin Gurnaney reported that Tata Starbucks would use only compostable and recyclable bundling materials over the entirety of its stores from June 2020.
Starbucks Corporation In India
Starbucks reported its entrance in Gujarat on 7 August 2019. The organization opened five stores in Surat and Ahmedabad the following day. Starbucks’ leader store in the state is situated at Prahlad Nagar, Ahmedabad, and offers more vegan alternatives than other Indian outlets.
Starbucks currently has over 450 stores across 70 cities in India and is planning to reach 1000 stores by 2028.
Starbucks’ strategies for business in India seemed rock-solid but the brand wasn’t completely immune still. In any case, the world’s biggest bistro chain is building its position cautiously via a progression of well-picked steps. Numerous worldwide brands have entered India since the 1990s, being pulled in by its developing and optimistic customer base. Yet, not all have succeeded. The Starbucks case analysis highlights how strategic partnerships and localized approaches helped the brand succeed in the Indian market.
Starbucks isn’t the primary contestant in India’s composed espresso showcase; so it doesn’t have any first-participant advantage. Cafe Coffee Day (CCD) is the market head while Barista Lavazza was the main espresso chain to open for business. Both are valued by the white-collar class. Costa Coffee, Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf (CBTL), and Gloria Jean are valued by the rich group in India.
India is customarily a tea-drinking nation, so espresso chains have concentrated on giving a feel where individuals can unwind and invest energy with one another. This setup implies higher capital expenses. It is different from the US, where the vast majority have a liking for espresso. The Indian buyer base has likewise advanced in the recent decade. What can worldwide brands like Starbucks do to augment their odds of achievement in India?
Starbucks – Business Strategy in India
Picking a Local Partner
Worldwide brands face the difficult choice of either going solo or tying up with a nearby accomplice. Starbucks’ choice to team up with India’s TATA Global Beverages demonstrates attention to utilizing different advantages. The TATA Group is one of India’s morally determined brands, an observation passed on about Starbucks India too.
Given that India produces espresso beans in just a couple of spots, the other sourcing alternative was bringing in the beans. Be that as it may, this would have raised costs fundamentally.
Tata’s espresso plant in Karnataka has been contracted to supply beans to Starbucks universally, making common cooperative energies. It has contracted to take into account TATA’s TAJ SATS, which supplies TATA’s top-notch lodging network â TAJ. The TATAs are put into the retail part with store brands like Westside, Tanishq, Croma, Star Bazaar, and so forth. Starbucks can use them for information sharing on Indian land, territory points of interest, and handling land administrations. This would enable its very own development to outline. This strategy gives scope for store-in-store deals.
Keeping the store designs steady means it needs to pick and open new areas stringently, to such an extent that the area can yield a throughput by the venture. Its methodology in-store arrangement is different from CCD, which has picked various configurations to tap the potential interest in any region. CCD has opened a couple of premium outlets dependent on the area’s customer profile. It has additionally gone for non-store organizations like takeaway booths and candy machines. Be that as it may, Starbucks may expect that such non-store configurations may weaken its image esteem.
Estimating the Pace of Expansion
India is the place where an inability to screen primary concerns has tossed numerous organizations out of the rigging. So, a top-line just approach doesn’t work here. Since Starbucks needs to pick new areas stringently by its equivalent configuration approach, it has decided on a deliberate pace of extension. It is concentrating on the budgetary feasibility of every outlet, as opposed to going for an aggressive development plan which may have brought about rehashed calls for capital.
This operational process is different from its system in the USA and China where it has fabricated scale by opening stores in pretty much every area â being the main port-of-call for espresso by basically being all over the place. CCD’s methodology behind adaptable store organizations was to guarantee there is a CCD bistro at a simple reach. It is intriguing to check its normal store gainfulness given its scale.
Guaranteeing Top-Authority Backing and Responsibility
Top initiative responsibility from the two sides of the organization, Tata and Starbucks, has been plentifully clear. Starbucks took as much time as was needed to enter the market (6 years), recognizing that India was a mind-boggling market and required cautious passage arranging. The two sides have spoken finally about their dedication and shared their plans to give their business a new direction toward growth.
Altering Contributions to Suit Indian Market and Client Needs
Being adjusted to Indian culture, tastes, and inclinations conveyed at a suitable “esteem” guarantees customer importance, construct, and continued utilization. Starbucks mirrors this comprehension â as observed through a blend of Western staples, a wide scope of intriguing Indian tidbits similar to confined refreshments on the idea. Since its experience ( and item as well, however to a lesser degree) is its image guarantee, its test lies in conveying an all-around steady, yet locally significant brand experience.
The stores, or the “third spot” as Starbucks calls them, have been altered likewise. The stores don’t pursue the worldwide layout and appear to have been planned with consideration, with neighborhood contacts consolidated. Stores in various urban communities have been structured unexpectedly, mirroring the neighborhood culture â e.g., New Delhi’s store has ropes and chat on the dividers and henna designs on the floor, though the Pune store has a rich showcase of collectibles and copper.
Starbucks appears to have made a confined plan of action, planned for conveying a universally reliable item and involvement with locally-focused costs. The Tata group conveys a major sourcing advantage (attributable to its quality over the generation chain, developing, broiling, and exchanging espresso), yet it has just gone past that to develop and support associations with nearby espresso cultivators â putting resources into structure economical cultivating rehearses. All of Starbucks’ espresso is sourced locally, a first-ever for the organization.
Scaling up using Arrangements and Organizations
The Tata organization is the genuine overthrow in the Starbucks passage story. Having Tata as an accomplice is gigantically profitable, not due to the validity and strength it offers, or because it coordinates the scale and stature of Starbucks as an organization.
It offers numerous advantages catalyzing pretty much every market section achievement variable – for example, The Tata group has involvement in the retail business, a solid reputation in advancing new pursuits, gives a sourcing advantage through Tata espresso, offers access to high-traffic areas using its lodgings and other retail outlets, guarantees excellent nourishment and refreshment supply through its F&B business and so forth.
Furthermore, the potential for an effective organization is amazingly high given Starbucks’ and Tata’s mutual qualities â the two of them have a solid social inner voice and are resolved to “give back” to the general public and network.
Influencing India for Worldwide Items
Not long after it finished its first year, Starbucks reported that it was serving top-quality Indian Arabica espresso as “Indian coffee” in different markets. Another world-class office for cooking and bundling has just been initiated in Coorg, Karnataka; the results of which are to be analyzed in India and abroad.
Overseeing Discernment and Guidelines
This viewpoint is tied in with structure, a solid positive observation, and a picture for the business and brand crosswise over key outer partners and crowds â incorporating the administration, corporate accomplices, networks inside the eco-framework, and customers on the loose. Given what Starbucks has figured out how to accomplish in a year and a half since dispatch, it appears to be genuinely evident that its thought combined with the Tata advantage (critical reach and impact) has helped in developing solid connections and a positive picture with key outside partners and voting demographics.
Engage Nearby Association
Starbucks is by all accounts constructing a nation-explicit activity with nearby individuals in charge and overall unmistakable customer interface focuses, giving them the necessary position to coordinate and work. There is overwhelming interest in enlisting the perfect individuals and giving the essential preparation â to install and instill the organization’s culture and administration models.
Along these lines, how has Starbucks fared against the McKinsey spread out variables for long-haul India achievement? Its accomplishments against the scorecard look noteworthy. With thorough vigorous passage arranging and brilliant and quick execution, the multi-month-old endeavor appears to have impressive force, making purchaser and network-driven ventures and focused on sustaining its center business and brand. It appears to be very much set to “win” in India.
Whether Starbucks will collect a huge piece of the overall industry and accomplish its objective of India being among its best 5 markets over the long haul is not yet clear. It’s still early days, yet for the organization, this appears to be an incredible beginning and a great globalization model for multinationals looking for an India section.
Starbucks – Products
Aside from the typical items offered globally, Starbucks in India has some Indian-style item contributions, for example, Tandoori Paneer Roll, Chocolate Rossomalai Mousse, Malai Chom Tiramisu, Elaichi Mewa Croissant, Chicken Kathi Roll, and Murg Tikka Panini to suit Indian customers. All coffees sold in Indian outlets are produced using Indian broiled espressos by Tata Coffee. Starbucks additionally sells Himalayan packaged mineral water. Free Wi-Fi is accessible at all Starbucks stores.
Starbucks Espresso Cappuccino
In January 2017, Tata Starbucks presented Starbucks’ tea image “Teavana”. Teavana offers 18 unique assortments of tea in India. One of the assortments called the India Spice Majesty Blend was explicitly created for the Indian market and is only accessible in India. India Spice Majesty Blend is a mix of full-leaf Assam dark tea injected with entire cinnamon, cardamom, cloves, pepper, star anise, and ginger. On 15 June 2015, Tata Starbucks reported that it was suspending the utilization of fixings that had not been affirmed by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI).
The organization didn’t indicate what the fixings were or which items they were utilized in. The organization additionally expressed that it was applying for FSSAI endorsement for these ingredients.
Starbucks Corporation Other Products
As per the Latte Index positioning of the expense of a tall hot latte at Starbucks in 44 nations, India was the fifth most costly nation to buy the drink depending on January 2016 costs. The record distributed by US-based buyer research firm ValuePenguin found that a tall hot latte cost $7.99 in India, far higher than the $2.75 it costs in the least expensive nation, the United States, yet much lower than the $12.32 in the most costly nation, Russia.
Tata Starbucks propelled the Starbucks Delivers program in mid-2019. The administration offers home conveyance from Starbucks outlets through an organization with Swiggy. The administration was first propelled in Mumbai, with designs to turn it out to other cities.
In its menu, the Tata Starbucks company has launched ice-creams as their new products. The frozen delights are available even in flavours like java chip and caramel macchiato among others and will come in takeaway tubs and single scoops. The ice-creams are now available in 50-60% of the Starbucks stores.
Starbucks – Business Growth
Net Revenue of Starbucks Worldwide From 2013 to 2024
Tata Starbucks, a joint venture between Tata Consumer Products Limited (TCPL) and the American coffee chain Starbucks, reported a loss of INR 81 crore in the 2024 fiscal year, according to TCPL’s annual report. This is a bigger loss compared to the INR 23.9 crore loss in the previous year, FY23. Despite this, the company’s revenue from operations grew by 12% in FY24.
In FY24, Tata Consumer Products invested INR 25 crore into the coffee chain, which also opened the most new stores in India since starting the joint venture in 2012. However, the coffee chain faced challenges in profitability due to weak demand for quick service restaurants (QSRs) in general. Tata Starbucks, which is hoping to make back the initial investment in the current money, has opened 380 stores to date.
Tata Starbucks, a 50:50 joint endeavor between Tata Global Beverages and Starbucks Coffee of the US, has announced a 30% top-line development in financial 2018-19, driven by new store openings and improved execution. Tata Starbucks announced “twofold digit top-line development – 30% for the entire year, driven by new stores and improved store execution,” Tata Global Beverages Ltd (TGBL) said in a financial specialists’ introduction. Tata Starbucks’s income for 2018-19 is required to be approximately INR 450 crores.
TGBL said Tata Starbucks opened 30 outlets in the past financial year, out of which 15 new stores were opened during the last quarter of the money-related year. The organization claimed detailed benefits at the store level; all urban areas were likewise productive and additionally saw an ascend in nourishment share in general deals.
The Starbucks company added around 40 stores in FY21 but the company had recorded a 33% Y-O-Y fall in its revenues during the same fiscal. According to Sushant Dash, CEO of Tata Starbucks, the recovery that the company has seen after the second wave of COVID-19 was better than what it saw after the first wave of the deadly pandemic. The quarterly growth after Q2 FY22 was 120% more than what it saw during the same period in the previous fiscal. The company has hugely focused on home deliveries ever since the pandemic broke out. It has already addressed concerns associated with the spillage and other challenges about home delivery, which contributed to over 18% of the total sales that the company witnessed this fiscal, as per the reports in November 2021. Furthermore, the company has also added ice-creams to its menu in flavors like java chip and caramel macchiato. The Sanjeev Kapoor menu is another thing that has been freshly launched by Tata Starbucks. Besides, the company also launched a one-litre freshly brewed beverage and at-home coffee.
As per reports on 26 May 2025, Starbucks is starting self-service kiosks in Korea and Japan for the first time, allowing customers to place orders without talking to staff. Starbucks Korea said it will set up kiosks in about 10 stores this week. These stores are in busy areas like Seoul and Jeju Island, especially where many tourists visit.
The first kiosks will be placed in two stores in Seoulâs Myeong-dong area, which is popular with foreign visitors. People will be able to use the kiosks from early next month.
A Starbucks Korea spokesperson said the kiosks were made to help tourists who have trouble communicating due to language barriers. The goal is to make ordering easier and attract more visitors in tourist areas.
Tata Starbucks plans to operate 1000 stores in India by 2028. To reach its goal of having 1,000 stores by 2028, Tata Starbucks plans to double its workforce to around 8,600 employees. The company aims to expand into Tier 2 and 3 cities in India, increase the number of drive-thru locations, open more stores in airports, and add more 24-hour stores to better serve customers wherever they are.
Tata Starbucks Pvt. Ltd. is looking to forcefully grow its impression in the Indian market with its eyes on the quickly spreading “espresso culture” among the twenty to thirty-year-olds and upwardly versatile customers. Tata Starbucks, a JV between US-based Starbucks Coffee Company and Tata Global Beverages Ltd, hopes to set up altogether more number stores this monetary than it did previously.
With per-store venture prerequisites being evaluated at INR 1.7-2 crores, the complete CAPEX plan by the organization works out in an overabundance of INR 50 crores during current monetary on the off chance that it opens more stores than a year ago.
The organization is likewise open to different open doors for development including inorganic development through acquisitions. Be that as it may, when tested about any probability of a venture plan in the espresso chain Cafe Coffe Day (CCD), Gurnaney denied estimating any discussions for securing.
With an end goal to upgrade the client experience, Starbucks is presenting new nourishment things, taking into account all client needs including breakfast and lunch. The income share from nourishment things is right now around 25%, even as it keeps on developing with new things to meet the client’s needs.
FAQs
Who founded Starbucks?
Starbucks was started by Hun Baldwin, Zev Siegl, and Gordon Bowker in 1971.
Where was the first Starbucks started?
Starbucks was started in Pike Place Market, Seattle, Washington, United States.
When was Starbucks started in India?
Starbucks was launched in India in 2012.
What is the revenue of Starbucks?
Starbucks revenue was recorded at $35.98 billion in 2023.
How many Starbucks stores are there worldwide?
There are over 38000 Starbucks stores in the world as of 2023.
BSNL (Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited) was incorporated on 1st October 2000 by the Government of India under the ownership of the Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications. The largest government-owned wireless telecommunications service provider in India is headquartered in Delhi. The Chairman and Managing Director of BSNL is a government civil servant of the Indian Communication Finance Service or a central government engineer of the Indian Telecommunications Service.
As of February 2025, BSNL Mobile boasts a subscriber base of 91.01 million, ranking as the 4th largest mobile telecommunications network in India and the 25th largest globally. BSNLâs operating revenue grew by 7.8% in FY25, reaching INR 20,841 crore, compared to INR 19,330 crore in the previous year. Its total income also went up by 10% to INR 23,427 crore, up from INR 21,302 crore last year.
Although BSNL began strong and recorded profits for the first few years of its operations, it began recording losses after the year 2009. The company has recorded consistent losses in the last thirteen years of its operations. The company had reported a net loss of INR 5367 crore for the year ending March 31, 2024.
BSNL owes its emergence to British India. It was the British who laid the foundation of the telecom network in India in the 19th century, establishing the first telegraph line in 1850 between Kolkata (erstwhile Calcutta) and Diamond Harbour. Within the next four years, the British East India Company laid telegraph lines across the country and opened the service to the masses in 1854. A year later, the British Imperial Legislative Council passed the Indian Telegraph Act.
Post Indiaâs independence in 1947, the Post and Telegraph departments were bifurcated in the 1980s, and the Department of Telecom was established. The history of BSNL shows its rise as a major telecom player in the early 2000s, followed by a long period of decline due to competition and internal challenges.This eventually led to the emergence of government-owned telegraph and telephone enterprises, culminating in the foundation of BSNL.
Market Share of Wireless Mobile Operators in India
Why BSNL Failed | BSNL Downfall
Why BSNL Failed | BSNL Downfall
Founded at the turn of the century, BSNL successfully grew and expanded to reach annual revenues of approximately INR 40,000 crore in March 2007, compared to Airtelâs at INR 18,420 crore. Within the next two years, however, the PSUâs profits nosedived by 81% and its revenues fell by 6%. Since then, BSNL continued ailing year after year and by 31st March 2022 had incurred losses of INR 57,671 crore according to Devusinh Chauhan, Minister of State for Communication. By the end of October 2023, BSNL had experienced a cumulative loss of 21.4 million subscribers over 22 consecutive months, reducing its total subscriber count to just 92.87 million. The BSNL profit loss history reflects a sharp decline after 2007, with consistent losses accumulating over the years due to high costs and stiff market competition. The primary reasons for the continued downfall of BSNL are:
Tough Competition
Commanding a 21% market share in 2005, similar to that of Bharti Airtel, BSNL began losing its ground in 2009 consistently, and by 2022, its market share had plummeted to a mere 7.9%. The rest 92% of the market was controlled by three major players â Jio, Vodafone Idea, and Bharti Airtel. The other major reason was the price war. Jio entered the telecom market with extremely cheap tariffs, forcing all private and public players to reduce their tariffs. BSNL, however, did not raise their tariffs with the subsequent increase by Jio and other players, resulting in a drop in their average revenue earned by users per month to INR 53 from INR 118. The BSNL failure is mainly due to slow decision-making, high employee costs, and tough competition from private telecom players.
Bureaucratic Function
Slow decision-making and a lot of red tape plagued the PSU. It eventually resulted in the company not being able to compete with private player competitors. Opposition from unions, failure to update equipment quickly, and repeated and unchecked government interference also played a significant role in BSNLâs decline.
High Employee Cost
While the company was battling the rising market competition, it was also plagued internally with high employee maintenance costs. This cost accounted for approximately 55% to 60% of the companyâs expenditure.
The central government, in the past three years, has taken proactive steps to rescue the debt-ridden PSU from closing its doors permanently. Devusinh Chauhan, Minister of State for Communication, said that in October 2019, the Centre had approved a revival plan that included a reduction in employee costs through a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS), debt restructuring by the raising of sovereign guarantee bonds, administrative allotment of spectrum for 4G services through capital infusion, monetization of core and non-core assets, and in-principle approval of the merger of BSNL and MTNL. He said, âAs a result of these, BSNL and MTNL have become EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortisation) positive since the financial year 2020-2021.â The merger of BSNL and MTNL, however, has been delayed due to the formerâs high debt.
By July 2022, the Centre approved a second revival package for BSNL of INR 1.64 lakh crore,, worth INR 1.64 lakh crore, aiming to upgrade the PSUâs services, allocate spectrum, de-stress its balance sheet, and augment aiming to upgrade the PSUâs services, allocating spectrum, de-stressing its balance sheets, and augmenting its fiber network by merging BBNL with BSNL. The BSNL growth rate has shown signs of improvement recently, driven by government support and network upgrades.
On June 7, 2023, the Union Cabinet approved the long-awaited third revival package for BSNL, valued at over INR89,000 crore. With this approval, BSNL’s authorized capital has significantly increased from INR 1,50,000 crore to INR 2,10,000 crore. The Cabinet, chaired by PM Narendra Modi, has also granted BSNL a valuable allocation of 4G and 5G spectrum. These spectrum bandsâ700 MHz, 3,300 MHz, 26 GHz, and 2,500 MHzâare worth INR 46,338.60 crore, INR 26,184.20 crore, INR 6,564.93 crore, and INR 9,428.20 crore, respectively. BSNL’s goal is to expand 4G coverage to rural areas, offer high-speed internet through fixed wireless access (FWA) services, and support captive non-public networks (CNPN). This is indeed a major step forward for BSNL and the future of telecom services in our country.
âThe first two packages brought BSNL out of a very difficult situation to a stable one. Now, BSNL should become a player that is able to bring connectivity to places where other commercial companies will not be able to go,â said Telecom Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw.
Examples of Revival
Rural Connectivity Improving: BSNL upgraded its network in Himachal Pradesh under the BharatNet project and brought high-speed broadband to over 1,000 villages. This helped people access online education and health services.
Strategic Partnerships: BSNL teamed up with tech companies like TCS to build its core 4G network. This shows its strong push toward modern technology. Despite past struggles, the BSNL growth rate is expected to rise with the rollout of 4G services and increased rural connectivity efforts.
Customer-Centric Initiatives: By launching affordable prepaid plans, unlimited data offers, and free OTT subscriptions, BSNL has started winning back some of its old customers.
Sustainable Operations: Through its VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme), BSNL reduced its staff by over 70,000 employees. This move greatly lowered its operating costs.
BSNL Growth | Financials
BSNL Profit Loss History
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) has reported a profit of INR 262 crore in the third quarter of the financial year, marking its first return to profitability since 2007. This milestone reflects the companyâs focus on innovation, aggressive network expansion, cost optimization, and customer-centric service improvements.
Announcing the quarterly financial results, Shri A. Robert J. Ravi, CMD, BSNL, said:
âWe are pleased with our financial performance this quarter, which reflects our focus on innovation, customer satisfaction, and aggressive network expansion. With these efforts, we expect revenue growth to improve further, exceeding 20% by the end of the financial year. Revenue from Mobility, FTTH, and Leased Lines has increased by 15%, 18%, and 14% respectively over Q3 of the previous year. Additionally, BSNL has successfully reduced its finance cost and overall expenditure, leading to a decline in losses by over INR 1,800 crore compared to last year.
To enhance our customer experience, we have introduced new innovations such as National WiFi Roaming, BiTV â Free Entertainment for All Mobile Customers, and IFTV for All FTTH Customers. Our continuous focus on Quality of Service and Service Assurance has further strengthened customer trust and reinforced BSNLâs position as a leading telecom service provider in India.â
The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has forecasted that state-owned Bharat Sanchar Nigam (BSNL) will achieve profitability in FY27, with an expected profit of INR 558 crore. This projection is based on anticipated revenue growth driven by the launch of 4G and 5G services in the coming years.
BSNL is expected to achieve a growth rate of 73.5% in revenue, from INR 19,344 crore in FY24 to INR 33,553 crore in FY27.
Products and Services
The government-owned entity provides both fixed-line telephones and mobile services on the GSM platform operating under the brand name CellOne and BSNL across the country.
BSNL Mobile
Offering prepaid and postpaid mobile services, BSNL Mobile also provides value-added services like Free Phone Service, India Telephone Card, Account Card Calling, Virtual Private Networks, Tele-voting, Premium Rate Service, and IPTV for its customers to enjoy television through the internet and VVOIP (Voice & Video Over Internet Protocol).
BSNL Landline
It was the only fixed-line telephone service that was launched in the early 1990s in the country. Only BSNL and MTNL, the other government-owned entity, were allowed to provide landline phone services in the country. BSNL and MTNL held 37.4 percent of the landline market share as of August 31, 2022, and 6.14 million users of BSNL in December 2023.
Internet
With approximately 7.5 lakh km of fiber-based telecom network across the country, it is the fourth largest ISP (Internet Service Provider) in India.
Broadband
The companyâs broadband services include fixed-line and landline services using CDMA technology, providing internet access services through dial-up connections as prepaid, NetOne as postpaid, and DataOne as broadband.
Bharat Fibre
Launched in February 2019, Bharat Fibre offers IPTV, VoD (Video on Demand), VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol), AoD (Audio on Demand), BoD (Bandwidth on Demand), remote education, video conferencing services, interactive gaming, and Virtual Private LAN Services.
Bharat Net
In a revival effort, BSNL was merged with the governmentâs special purpose vehicle BBNL along with a package of INR 1.64 lakh crore. It gave the PSU an advantage of an additional 5.67 lakh km of optical fiber laid across 1.85 lakh village panchayats using the Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF).
4G Service
In January 2019, the public sector unit started the 4G services in a few cities and towns in the states of Bihar, Jharkhand, and Uttar Pradesh.
5G Services
BSNL CMD PK Purwar said in an interview that BSNL would begin 5G operations by 2025. Adhering to the Government of Indiaâs âAtmanirbhar Bharatâ, its 4G and 5G networks are set to be completely home-grown Indigenous technology.
BSNL Future Plans
Here are the details of BSNL’s growth plan for network improvement:
Moving to 4G Network: As part of the âAtma Nirbhar Bharatâ mission, BSNL plans to set up 100,000 4G sites across India. The 4G equipment will be ready for a future 5G upgrade. BSNL is also working on providing 4G services to villages that currently lack coverage.
Network Upgrades: BSNL is upgrading its network with Super Edge Routers for its internet and 4G rollout. They are also planning improvements like a new Billing & Customer Care System, Universal SIM, Over The Air (OTA) updates, and Embedded SIM (eSIM). BSNL is also planning to install Remote Fiber Test Systems for better monitoring and testing of its network, as well as using All-Dielectric Self-Supporting Optical Fiber Cable. International long-distance connections will also be switched from TDM to IP.
Broadband Upgrades: BSNL aims to make use of the Bharatnet infrastructure to improve internet access across India. They have started the BNG project to provide faster internet and are planning a MPLS-IP based Access and Aggregation Network (MAAN) to increase bandwidth and meet traffic needs.
Cyber-Security: BSNL is implementing cyber-security solutions in its MPLS Gateway Network and secured web filtering to ensure a safer online environment.
Challenges Ahead
BSNLâs efforts to bounce back are commendable, but it still faces some challenges:
Funding Needs: It needs ongoing investment to launch 5G and upgrade its network.
Tough Competition: Competing with fast-moving private companies is not easy.
Winning Back Customers: To regain customer trust, BSNL must keep improving its service quality over time.
Conclusion
Chauhan infused confidence in the PSU by saying, âWith the implementation of these measures, BSNL is expected to turn around and become a profit-earning entity.â BSNLâs journey, by no means, has been easy. Its profit-making operations quickly took a sharp downturn due to reasons that were, probably, avoidable. However, with the Central Governmentâs strong backing, the PSU is set to make a stronger comeback than before.
FAQs
Who is BSNL owner or founder?
BSNL (Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited) was incorporated on 1st October 2000 by the Government of India under the ownership of the Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications. BSNL is a 100% Govt. of India-owned Public Sector Undertaking with an authorized share capital of Rs. 1,50,000 crores. Government of India is the owner of BSNL.
What is the net worth of BSNL?
The net worth of BSNL as of 31 March 2024 is INR 106625 crore.
Is BSNL all over India?
BSNL Mobile has a pan-India presence with a presence in all 22 telecom circles in India. It is the fourth largest mobile network operator in India.
Who owns BSNL?
BSNL is owned by the Government of India.
Is BSNL planning to launch 5G?
BSNL CMD PK Purwar said in an interview that BSNL would begin 5G operations by 2025.
How does the revival package affect BSNL’s authorized capital?
The third revival package has increased BSNL’s authorized capital from Rs 1.50 lakh crore to Rs 2.10 lakh crore.
Which is the cheapest mobile recharge plan of BSNL?
The minimum BSNL validity recharge is 15 days at âč36. This recharge plan will give you free calls, data, and SMS at the lowest cost.
What is BSNL growth in last 10 years?
BSNL has incurred significant losses over the last 10 years, with a cumulative loss exceeding âč1,800 crore in FY23.
Why did BSNL fail?
BSNL failed due to slow upgrades, high costs, and strong competition from private telecom companies.
Telegram has emerged as one of the fastest-growing messaging apps, combining speed, security, and scalability. In 2025, with over 950 million monthly active users, it has become the go-to platform for brands looking to build tight-knit communities, boost engagement, and drive real sales, without fighting algorithms.
Whether you are a startup, a creator, or a fast-scaling brand, Telegram offers a direct line to your audience, raw, real, and ridiculously effective. In this article, we will walk you through everything you need to know: the fundamentals and benefits of Telegram marketing and how to launch your strategy step by step.
Telegram is now one of the worldâs leading messaging platforms. Statista ranks it as the third-most downloaded messenger app globally. Businesses and content creators actively use Telegram groups and channels to share updates, deliver exclusive content, run promotions, and engage with their followers in real time. With features like large group capacity, automation tools, and multimedia support, Telegram makes building and nurturing a loyal community easy without fighting algorithmic restrictions.
To further support business growth, Telegram recently introduced Telegram Business. This feature unlocks dedicated tools such as opening hours, business location, quick replies, automated messages, custom start pages, and even chatbot integration, turning Telegram into a full-fledged marketing and customer engagement platform.
What makes Telegram stand out from other messaging apps is that it is a gold mine for marketing. Its growing user base and powerful features offer brands a direct, engaging, and cost-effective way to connect with customers. Hereâs why Telegram deserves a spot in your marketing toolkit:
Reach a Massive Audience
Telegram gives you access to a wide and diverse audience with 950 M+active users and growing. Whether targeting a local niche or going global, Telegram instantly helps you reach the right people.
Built-In Privacy & Trust
In a data-driven world, privacy matters more than ever. Telegramâs end-to-end encryption ensures secure communication, boosting user confidence and strengthening brand credibility.
Feature-Rich Messaging
Think beyond text. Telegram supports images, videos, polls, voice notes, and even long-form content. Perfect for brands that want to communicate creatively and keep followers hooked.
Borderless Reach
No matter where your customers are, Telegram removes geographical limits. The platform makes international marketing easy, from global product launches to cross-border promotions.
Zero-Cost Distribution
No ads, no algorithms, no restrictions. Telegram lets you broadcast to your entire audience, for free. Itâs one of the most budget-friendly platforms for startups and small businesses.
Real Time Engagement
Unlike email or social media, Telegram delivers messages instantly and allows two-way conversations. Build communities, answer questions, run polls, and get feedback in real time.
Flexible Content Delivery
Text? Images? PDFs? Videos? Telegram supports it all. This flexibility gives marketers the creative freedom to deliver the right message, in the right format, at the right time.
High-Converting CTAs
Drive traffic, boost sign-ups, or promote flash sales; Telegram makes CTAs easy to embed in messages. With high open and click-through rates, itâs ideal for campaign conversions.
How to Develop Winning Marketing Strategies for Telegram?
How to Develop Winning Marketing Strategies for Telegram
While many brands focus on mainstream platforms, Telegram remains an underrated yet powerful marketing tool. With over 900 million users and standout features like bots, channels, and automation, itâs ideal for community-driven growth and engagement. Hereâs how to build an effective Telegram marketing strategy:
Create a Powerful Online Presence
Telegram doesnât offer a dedicated business profile like other platforms. Your brand is represented through:
Channels for broadcasting updates.
Groups for interactive discussions.
Chatbots for automation and support.
Admin accounts that manage everything behind the scenes.
Start by setting up a branded channel or group, and clearly define what users can expect, including exclusive content, offers, customer support, etc.
Find Your Target Audience
Telegram doesnât offer deep targeting or user data due to its privacy-first model. However, you can:
Start by inviting up to 200 contacts manually.
Promote your existing audience via social media, email, or your website.
Analyse similar Telegram groups or channels to identify where your audience already hangs out.
Since user data is limited, focus on behavioural patterns, what kind of content they engage with, when theyâre most active, and what communities they belong to.
Promote Through Public Groups
Group promotion can be highly effective if done right:
Find active public groups relevant to your niche.
Observe group culture and tone before posting.
Reach out to admins for permission or collaborations.
Share value-driven content, not just ads, with a subtle CTA and a link to your Telegram channel.
Stay active, helpful, and consistent.
By contributing genuinely, you can build authority and attract members organically.
Run Telegram Ads
Telegram’s ad platform offers exposure to millions, but comes with limitations:
Ads appear only in public channels with 1,000+ subscribers.
Targeting is limited to language and interest (no age, gender, or location).
That said, Telegram reports 500 billion monthly views across one-to-many channels, offering significant reach for those who can afford it.
One of the easiest ways to grow your Telegram channel is by sharing it across your other social platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter. If you already have an engaged audience, drop your Telegram link in bios, posts, or stories. Hereâs how you can do so:Promote your Telegram channel in niche forums and online communities relevant to your audience.
Engage with these communities to build trust and naturally introduce your channel.
Use targeted hashtags and mentions on social platforms to increase reach.
Collaborate with influencers or partners to cross-promote your Telegram channel.
Use Telegram for Real-Time Customer Support
Telegram isnât just for broadcasting updates; itâs a powerful tool for delivering fast, personalized customer support. With its instant messaging capabilities, brands can turn Telegram into a dedicated helpdesk channel to assist users efficiently.
Hereâs how to make the most of it:
Respond instantly to customer queries, reducing wait times and improving satisfaction.
Share product guides, FAQs, and updates to help users resolve issues on their own.
Deploy chatbots to handle repetitive questions and escalate complex or urgent issues to human agents.
Cross-Promotion
Telegram groups and channels are often very active, with constant new posts that can sometimes make it hard to stand out. As a business owner, you can turn this to your advantage by using cross-promotion. Collaborating with other relevant groups and channels helps raise awareness of your business and expands your reach. Beyond growth, cross-promotion is an excellent way to build relationships with other businesses and explore joint marketing opportunities.
Here are some effective tips for using cross-promotion for your Telegram business channel:
Find relevant partners: Look for groups and channels that align with your business and target audience to ensure the partnership is effective.
Reach out to admins: Contact the administrators of those groups or channels with a clear pitch outlining what you offer and what you expect in return.
Promote partnersâ content: Share and promote their content within your channel to boost exposure for both parties.
Monitor your metrics: Track engagement and growth to measure the success of your cross-promotion efforts and adjust your strategy accordingly.
Conclusion
The surge in businesses adopting Telegram as a core part of their marketing strategy is no coincidence. With its massive and engaged user base, real-time communication features, and growing suite of business tools, Telegram offers brands a direct, distraction-free channel to connect with their audience. Whether you want to launch exclusive products, drive instant engagement, or provide fast customer support, Telegram gives marketers the flexibility and reach they need in a crowded digital world.
Telegram is a cloud-based, cross-platform instant messaging service that offers fast, secure messaging, groups, channels, bots, and secret chats.
Is Telegram an Indian app?
No, Telegram was created by a Germany-based tech organization – Durov Software Industry.
How does Telegram marketing work?
Telegram marketing allows you to reach a large audience, build customer relationships, deliver customer support and monitor the performance of your campaign.
Why should businesses use Telegram for marketing?
Businesses should use Telegram for marketing because it offers access to a massive active user base, built-in privacy with end-to-end encryption, and powerful features like multimedia messaging and real-time engagement. Telegram enables zero-cost, algorithm-free message distribution and high-converting CTAs, making it an effective, scalable platform to build communities, boost engagement, and drive sales.
How do I create an effective marketing strategy on Telegram?
To develop a winning Telegram marketing strategy, start by creating a strong online presence with branded channels and chatbots. Find and engage your target audience by inviting contacts and analyzing groups. Promote via public groups, Telegram ads, and social media. Use real-time support and cross-promotion to boost reach and engagement.
Even if the formula is only dried milk, vegetable oils, and sugars, the key factor is the company’s marketing, which has led people to feel that the formula is essential for their babies’ growth and wellness and that breast milk is insufficient. You can see how misguided this is because most medical experts agree that breast milk, and only breast milk, is the greatest nourishment for infants.
The company expanded its baby formula market in the 1970s and began advertising its baby formula as superior to breast milk, attempting to manipulate customers by spreading the narrative that its formula is beneficial for infants and provides all of the necessary nutrients that breast milk cannot. They even bribed medical specialists to testify on their behalf. This is so ethically terrible that no one can dispute it.
Under-educated mothers of underdeveloped countries believed that women were dressed as nurses. The free samples were weighed and packaged strategically to last just up to the day when the mothers were fully dependent on the formula and stopped lactating themselves.
The worst impact was in the underdeveloped regions of the world, where mothers were diluting the formula with more water to save money and were unknowingly starving the children. Breast milk provides all the elements vital for the development of the baby and its immune system. With a lack of natural milk, the babies from underdeveloped regions with no access to clean water suffered from many diseases and died.
The Baby Killer – Nestle is Evil
It resulted in thousands of deaths, and the formula was even named âBaby Killerâ by the media. When the situation got worse and people started getting mad about this and protesting, the World Health Organisation, in 1981, passed an International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes, condemning the unethical practices. But the damage was done. The company, often criticized as “Nestle is evil,” tried to clear their name and started mentioning in their advertisements that breast milk cannot be replaced.
Even though the company is trying its best to keep its baby formulaâs image squeaky clean after the big “Baby Killer” blunder by promoting ads encouraging mothers and talking about the benefits of natural milk, they are still pushing the baby formula and bribing health workers in countries with lenient laws and still getting away with it.
They tried to improve their image by including ‘fair trade’ marks on their labels to showcase that the chocolate bars are made with ethically sourced cocoa, but it didnât solve the main problem, which was illegal child labor. They still have farms and plants where forced child labor is taking place, but they havenât done much about it and do not provide any proof that the products sold are ethically made.
As discussed earlier, the companyâs plastic water bottles are the major culprits of water and land pollution. The single-use plastic is the main reason for littering and water pollution. The company has claimed to replace all their single-use plastic bottles with recyclable ones. But there is no progress in that department yet.
According to the latest reports from the Ellen McArthur Foundation, the company has done nothing, made zero progress in the environmentally safe sector, and has not addressed the waste they are generating at all.
Health Concerns
In July 2009, the FDA and CDC issued a cautionary statement urging consumers to avoid Nestle Toll House refrigerated cookie dough due to an E. coli outbreak affecting over 50 individuals across 30 states. This contamination resulted in hospitalizations and tragically claimed one life. Nestle responded by expressing grave concern, acknowledging their product’s implication in the illness and fatality, and subsequently implementing more rigorous testing and inspection procedures for raw materials and finished goods to meet higher quality standards.
In a larger-scale crisis in 2008, Nestle faced the Chinese Milk Scandal, where their products were linked to six infant deaths and numerous hospitalizations due to melamine contamination. Despite Nestle’s denial, the Taiwanese government detected traces of melamine in their products, prompting Nestle to dispatch specialists from Switzerland to enhance chemical testing at five Chinese plants. The incident became a major global food safety concern, with China reporting over 300,000 victims, resulting in severe legal consequences, including executions and life sentences for those implicated.
Promoting Unhealthy Foods and Deceptive Labeling – Nestle is Evil
Nestle, a company that has positioned itself as a leading health and wellness company, has faced criticism for promoting unhealthy food. A report by the UK Consumers Association revealed that seven out of the top fifteen high-sugar, fat, and salt breakfast cereals were Nestle products. Nestle has been accused of targeting children with their marketing practices.
In an interview, Nestle’s chairman, Mr Brabeck, defended his breakfast choice of a dark chocolate tablet as a balanced start to his day. However, this attitude further fueled the perception that Nestle was not prioritizing healthier alternatives in its product offerings.
In addition to concerns about unhealthy food, Nestle faced accusations of deceptive practices in Colombia in 2002. The company was ordered by the police to decommission 320 tons of imported powdered milk because of false relabeling, which included a different local brand and altered production dates. This raised ethical and legal issues and underscored potential health risks for consumers.
Controversy Surrounding Maggi
The Maggi Controversy – Nestle Unethical Practices
Nestle is bad and is known as an unethical company because of the use of child labor and the manufacturing of plastic bottles that damage the environment.
Nestle was being boycotted because it manipulated uneducated mothers by selling its infant formula in poor countries, leading to malnutrition.
Is Nestle a bad company?
Nestle is criticized for labor practices, water usage, marketing tactics, and plastic pollution. However, they try to source ethically and be sustainable. Ultimately, judging their “goodness” depends on your ethics.
Nestle is so evil because Nestle is criticized for child labor, formula marketing, water overuse, and plastic waste. These issues have worsened Nestle reputation and made it an “evil company”.
In an arena where the digital economy is blossoming, messaging apps have evolved beyond simple communication tools to become platforms for commerce and content sharing. Among them, Telegram, founded by Pavel Durov, has distinguished itself through a unique combination of speed, security, and privacy.
Telegram is amazingly free and open-source software that offers tons of facilities, such as cloud-based instant messaging, end-to-end encryption, and many others. Telegram offers its users dozens of interesting features. They can create their sticker sets as well as create bots. The users can create or join different channels that provide tons of fascinating content for users to subscribe to.
ââTelegram does not believe in selling ads for promotion because the personal data shared with advertisers could go against its ethos. That’s why all the funding for Telegram comes directly from Pavel Durov. In case of increasing the revenue number, Telegram would begin users’ donations funding or the freemium model.
In June 2022, Telegram switched to freemium when it introduced paid subscriptions. Additional features, such as double the number of channels they could follow, faster download speed, and premium stickers, were provided to the paying users. Reducing fees and taxes, the in-app revenue of the platform exceeded $1 million in October 2022. The largest share came from iOS users.
Telegram Monthly Active Users
ââTelegram is a company that operates in fair secrecy and prioritizes its affirmation of freedom from any pressure that could come from the market or any other nationally assigned restrictions. Telegram has gained immense popularity among its customers in many countries across the globe.
The question of how Telegram earns money is particularly intriguing, given its steadfast approach to user privacy and ad-free experience. This insight adds a compelling layer to the app’s business model, setting it apart from competitors and making it a fascinating subject for analysis. This article is all about the intricacies of Telegramâs fiscal strategies, offering insights into how Telegram works and how it earns money without compromising its core principles. Furthermore, we shall also look at the challenges and risks associated with this approach, providing a comprehensive overview that sheds light on the financial underpinnings of one of the most innovative messaging platforms today.
The very popular open-source messaging application, Telegram, provides various facilities to its customers, including file sharing, VoIP, end-to-end encryption on video calls, and many others. Telegram was founded in August 2013 by Nikolai Durov and Pavel Durov. The company is headquartered in London, United Kingdom, and Dubai, UAE, and is operational. Telegram is the highest preferred messaging application in Uzbekistan and Iran. Today, Telegram has over 700 million active users.
In 2023, Telegram reached around 1 billion downloads, ranked by worldwide downloads, and is the 7th most popular non-gaming app in Google Play. Telegram is an open-source application, but its server is closed-source. More than 15 billion messages are sent through Telegram every day.
Here’s a more detailed look at Telegram’s growth:
March 2014: 35 million users
April 2020: 400 million users
April 2022: 500 million users
July 2023: 800 million users
March 2025: 1 billion users
Telegram has experienced remarkable growth, expanding its user base from 35 million in March 2014 to 800 million by July 2023âa surge of over 2185%. Notably, the platform doubled its users from 400 million to 800 million between April 2020 and April 2022 alone.
ââTelegram provides its server, which is distributed to five data centers located in various regions to minimize the company’s data load. The operational centers are established in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Meanwhile, the legal center was established in London, United Kingdom.
ââTelegram’s business model stands out in the competitive scene of messaging apps by focusing on user-centric features and robust privacy measures. This approach not only differentiates it from other platforms but also highlights its unique selling propositions (USPs) that make it a powerful tool for users worldwide.
Telegram Business Model | How Telegram Makes Money
Telegram’s business model is entirely based on users’ convenience and features. The company was founded in 2013, but it hasn’t generated much revenue. Back in 2018, Telegram revealed its intentions to create its blockchain network called Telegram Open Network (TON), as well as a cryptocurrency token called Gram. The goal of this project was to transform the way people communicate online by providing a secure and decentralized platform for various applications, including payments. Through an Initial Coin Offering, Telegram raised more than $1.7 billion. But later, in 2019, the SEC stopped this plan and announced it was unlawful (The SEC alleged that Telegram’s Gram tokens were unregistered securities and that the company had violated securities laws).
After this, the co-founder Durov kept the company up with the money he earned from selling the VK stake he owned.
ââBut lately, Telegram has experienced immense growth because of this, the company has monetized the service. In 2020, Telegram’s CEO, Durov announced on his public Telegram channel that they would be monetizing Telegram’s services.
ââTelegram would not charge any cost to the users, nor would it show any ads in private or group chats. That’s why Telegram is looking forward to other methods to gain enough revenue.
Telegram Boosts Business Model with Premium AI Bot Automation
Telegramâs latest update strengthens its business model by expanding automation features for Premium Telegram Business accounts. Businesses can now integrate third-party botsâincluding AI-powered onesâto handle messaging, profile updates, transactions, and story posting. These bots can be granted granular permissions, such as managing messages or editing posts, enhancing workflow automation for business users. This focus on advanced automation and premium business tools highlights Telegramâs strategy to monetize its vast user base through paid subscriptions and value-added services tailored for enterprises and professional users.
User-centric Focus â The X Factor
Telegram has been pretty vocal about its emphasis on user convenience and a feature-rich experience. Unlike many other messaging apps, Telegram was not designed with profit generation as its primary goal. Instead, the platform focuses on providing a seamless and enhanced messaging experience. This is evident from its introduction of innovative features such as chat folders, message scheduling, and the ability to edit sent messages, which significantly enhance user convenience. The platform’s dedication to maintaining an ad-free environment in private chats underscores its commitment to user experience over revenue generation. BTW, there’s a Telegram X as well for people who love flexibility. Phew!
Privacy Is Precious, Indeed
Telegram’s approach to privacy is revolutionary and forms a core part of its business model. The platform offers end-to-end encryption for private conversations, ensuring that only the communicating users can access the messages. Telegram’s stringent data protection policies are highlighted by its record of disclosing zero bytes of user data to third parties, including governments. This commitment is further supported by features like two-factor authentication, self-destructing messages, and customizable privacy settings that allow users to control who sees their profile information and messaging status.
Feature Set, Spoil Them With Options
Telegram’s array of unique features significantly contributes to its standing as a preferred messaging app. The platform supports a multitude of user-friendly features, such as the ability to send silent messages, which do not disturb the receiver, and the option to delete messages for all participants long after they have been sent. Additionally, Telegram offers advanced security features like passcode and biometric locks for individual chats, enhancing personal security. The app’s ability to handle large groups and broadcast channels effectively, coupled with minimalistic, privacy-conscious sponsored messages, provides a balanced approach to user engagement and platform monetization.
Telegram, thus, not only ensures a high level of user satisfaction but also aligns with the growing global demand for digital privacy and secure communication. This strategic focus on user benefits over direct profitability sets Telegram apart in the digital communication space, making its business approach a powerful example of innovation and user-first orientation in technology.
What Is Unique About the Business Model of Telegram
ââTelegram runs on a very smooth business model, and the most unique thing about it is that Telegram wasn’t made to make a profit. The messaging application Telegram was founded to make messaging handy for users with many fascinating features. It has a whole bunch of features that make it unique from the other applications. These features are:
Telegram offers the option of editing the text after sending it. You can also delete them from both sides at your convenience.
You can access your messages anytime from any device through the availability of a cross-platform.
Options for replying, hashtags, and mentioning to make your chatting more fruitful.
A feature to mute any group so that you don’t get unnecessary notifications.
A feature to pin any message, which will be displayed at the top of the chat screen.
Share any file with a maximum size of 2GB ormore.
How Does Telegram Make Money | Telegram Revenue Model
Telegram Revenue (In-App Purchases)4GB
Telegram does not make any profit from its application and services. In 2020, there was zero revenue made. The founders believe in providing fast and secure messaging. ââTelegram does not believe in selling ads for promotion because the personal data shared with advertisers could go against its ethos. Telegram. In June 2022, Telegram launched Telegram Premium, a subscription model that offers extended limits, faster download speed, and larger file uploads.
Although the company does have backup plans in case of urgent money, Telegram would look for non-essential paid options to generate money. Telegram prioritizes its customers the most and provides them with the best features for free. Telegram usually makes money from its founders, which is a significant source of income. Telegram also started offering a variety of in-app purchases, such as premium stickers and emoji packs. These purchases generate revenue for Telegram through the App Store and Google Play Store.
Current Revenue Streams
Telegram has innovatively expanded its revenue streams, adapting to the evolving digital verticals while maintaining its user-centric philosophy.
Telegram Revenue Streams
Hereâs a closer look at the primary sources through which Telegram generates revenue:
In-app Purchases
Telegram introduced “Telegram Stars,” an in-app payment system that allows users to buy digital goods and services within the platform’s mini-apps, such as games and productivity tools. This system not only enhances the user experience by integrating a seamless transaction process but also adheres to the digital product sale guidelines of major app stores. Users can purchase Stars directly in the app and use them for a variety of digital products, enhancing engagement within the Telegram ecosystem. Additionally, these Stars can be converted to TON, the native token of The Open Network, through the Fragment exchange, highlighting Telegram’s innovative approach to in-app purchases.
Premium Subscriptions
Telegram Premium, launched as a voluntary subscription service, offers users additional exclusive features while supporting the app’s development. Features like doubled limits, 4GB file uploads, and advanced chat management are just a few of the benefits that enhance user interaction and platform utility. This subscription model is part of Telegram’s sustainable monetization strategy, driven by user contributions rather than traditional advertising, allowing the platform to remain independent and prioritize user privacy and satisfaction.
Sponsored Messages
The Telegram Ad Platform facilitates the creation of sponsored messages displayed in large public channels with over 1000 subscribers. These messages are designed to increase audience loyalty and boost brand engagement without disrupting the user experience. Sponsored messages on Telegram are unique as they do not contain external links; instead, they direct users to the brand’s channel, fostering a more immersive interaction. This method of advertising emphasizes content quality and relevance, aiming to build long-term trust and loyalty among users.
Through these diversified revenue streams, Telegram continues to thrive as a powerful messaging platform, balancing profitability with its commitment to user privacy and satisfaction. The strategic implementation of these monetization methods underscores Telegram’s unique business approach, setting it apart from other messaging apps in the market.
Hereâs a detailed overview of Telegramâs global downloads on the App Store and Google Play since 2017:
Telegram App Downloads
Key Features of Telegram
ââTelegram offers tons of features to make messaging convenient for users. Some of the features are-
Lock Chat – where you can lock any of your chats with a password.
Self-destructing Media – where you can put a timer on any of your media, and it will be destroyed after that specific time.
Two-step verification – where you can protect your account from being hacked with two steps of verification.
Delete sender’s messages – where you can delete any message or chat from both sides (receiver and sender).
Telegram Premium – It is a paid version of Telegram that includes exclusive additional features. Telegram Premium features with a higher upload size, fast download speed, Premium Stickers, Advanced Chat Management, and more.
âTelegram offers dozens of features and user preferences. The Telegram app is specially designed for people above the age of 16 years, with no parental controls overhead. This messaging application targets the youth with many end-to-end encrypted features.
Comparison with Other Messaging Platforms
Revenue Models of Other Apps
When comparing Telegram to other messaging platforms like WhatsApp, the revenue models reveal distinct approaches. WhatsApp, owned by Meta, primarily utilizes the WhatsApp Business API to support businesses in automating communication and managing customer interactions effectively. This includes features like approved message templates and conversational chatbots, which enhance the customer experience by personalizing interactions based on the userâs profile. Additionally, WhatsApp introduced a payment feature in India, allowing direct bank transfers within the app, ensuring secure transactions without storing sensitive financial data.
In contrast, Telegram focuses on user contributions and minimal advertising through its unique features, such as Telegram Premium and sponsored messages. Telegram Premium offers enhanced capabilities for a subscription fee, while sponsored messages in large public channels provide a non-intrusive advertising option, aligning with Telegramâs user privacy commitment.
User Privacy and Data Handling
Privacy and security are paramount in today’s digital communication industry. Telegram and WhatsApp both offer end-to-end encryption, but their implementation differs significantly. WhatsApp encrypts all communications by default, ensuring that only the communicating users can access the content. However, its backups stored on cloud services are not encrypted, which could pose a security risk.
Telegram, on the other hand, provides optional end-to-end encryption through its “Secret Chats” feature, which is not enabled by default. Regular chats use client-server encryption and are stored on Telegramâs servers, accessible across multiple devices. This flexibility is appealing to those who prioritize convenience but raises concerns for users seeking stringent privacy measures. Telegramâs commitment to user privacy is further emphasized by features like self-destructing messages and customizable privacy settings, which are not as prevalent on WhatsApp.
Market Positioning
The market positioning of Telegram and WhatsApp reflects their differing priorities and user base appeal. WhatsAppâs widespread adoption and default encryption make it a preferred choice for everyday users seeking reliable and straightforward communication. Its integration into the broader Meta ecosystem also provides seamless connectivity with other services, appealing to a vast global audience.
Conversely, Telegram appeals to users who value privacy, flexibility, and extensive features. Its ability to handle large groups and channels, coupled with robust file-sharing capabilities (supporting files up to 2GB), positions it as a versatile platform suitable for both personal and professional use. Telegramâs design and open API also attract tech-savvy users and developers looking for a customizable and secure messaging environment.
Both platforms have carved niches that cater to specific user needs, whether it’s enhancing user privacy or integrating business functionalities. The choice between Telegram and WhatsApp often depends on the user’s priorities, such as default security features versus flexible privacy controls and rich feature sets.
Most Popular Global Mobile Messenger Apps as of February 2025, based on Number of Monthly Active Users
As of February 2025, WhatsApp leads the global messaging space with 2 billion monthly active users, reflecting its deep penetration in international markets, especially outside the U.S. In comparison, WeChat reported over 1.38 billion users, and Facebook Messenger had around 947 million users globally. The rise of instant messaging servicesâallowing real-time text communication over the internetâhas been fueled by the widespread adoption of smartphones and mobile apps. These platforms have evolved far beyond simple text, now offering group chats, multimedia sharing (images, videos, audio), and interactive features like stickers and emoticons, making them versatile tools for both personal and professional communication.
Telegram’s steadfast focus on privacy and security, while a significant unique selling proposition, also brings forth substantial regulatory challenges. The platform’s commitment to user privacy and its encrypted communication services limit its ability to regulate content effectively. This has led to controversies, especially when governments demand oversight over illegal activities. The absence of a clear procedure for moderating public channels based on government requests can lead to speculation and uncertainty about Telegram’s operations, potentially affecting its reputation and user trust.
Competition
In the competitive circles of messaging apps, Telegram faces formidable opponents like WhatsApp, Viber, and Slack, each with its own set of advanced features and user base. While Telegram prioritizes privacy and speed, its competitors often integrate more comprehensive business tools and broader ecosystem connections, which might attract a segment of users looking for more than just secure messaging. Balancing innovation in privacy with competitive features that appeal to a broader audience remains a critical challenge for Telegram.
Sustainability Concerns
Despite its popularity, Telegram’s business model, which prioritizes user convenience over profit generation, raises sustainability concerns. The platform’s reluctance to monetize through traditional methods like advertising or data selling, while admirable, means it must rely on alternative revenue streams such as optional paid features and in-app purchases. This approach may not sustain the financial needs required for scaling operations and developing new technologies. Furthermore, its historical lack of revenue generation as of 2020 puts additional pressure on the platform to find viable long-term financial strategies without compromising its core values.
Conclusion
By weaving together innovative in-app purchases, a premium subscription model, and non-intrusive sponsored messages, Telegram has carved out a unique niche. It has demonstrated that a business model can thrive on principles that prioritize user benefits over sheer profit, highlighting its unique selling proposition (USP) as a haven for secure and private communication. This strategic focus has not only distinguished Telegram among its peers but has also set a benchmark for integrating user-centric values with sustainable monetization strategies in the tech industry. Looking ahead, Telegram’s approach hints at broader implications for messaging platforms and digital businesses at large. Its ability to generate revenue while steadfastly maintaining its core commitments presents a powerful case study on the potential harmonization between user privacy and business growth. Telegramâs model, underscored by a veteran understanding of business intricacies and a deep commitment to research-backed solutions, sets a compelling precedent for future innovation in technology, privacy, and user engagement.
Telegram is a privacy-focused secure messaging application that has grown immensely in the last few years. There’s a lot to talk about when it comes to Telegram. For now, we have the best knowledge regarding its business model.
FAQs
What is the Telegram App?
Telegram is a cloud-based, cross-platform instant messaging service that offers fast, secure messaging, groups, channels, bots, and secret chats.
How much is Telegram’s revenue?
ââTelegram does not make any profit from its application and services. As of 2020, there is zero revenue made. However, they have started their in-app purchases worldwide and generated 6.1 million U.S. dollars in February 2024.
Who is the founder of Telegram?
Pavel Durov and Nikolai Durov founded Telegram in 2013. Pavel Durov is also Telegram’s CEO.
Who is Pavel Durav?
Pavel Durav is the co-founder and CEO of Telegram.
Is Telegram an Indian app?
No, Telegram was created by a Germany-based tech organization – Durov Software Industry.
Which is the best alternative to Telegram?
Signal messaging app is the best alternative to Telegram.
Who are the top competitors of Telegram?
Telegram’s top competitors include:
Viber
Signal
WhatsApp
Slack
Intis Telecom
How Telegram earn money?
Telegram makes money through various methods such as affiliate marketing and referral programs. Channel or group administrators can share affiliate links or referral codes, earning commissions for every purchase or sign-up made through these referrals.
What is Telegram business model?
Telegramâs business model includes earning from in-app purchases, advertising, promotions, and forming partnerships and collaborations. This model supports the provision of free services to users while also funding its operational needs and promoting growth.
How can businesses utilize Telegram?
Businesses can use Telegram by integrating bots that automate message processing and responses. These bots facilitate the integration of existing tools and workflows, or the implementation of AI assistants to manage communications within the platform.
Can you legitimately earn money using Telegram?
Yes, earning money on Telegram is legitimate. Channel owners can profit through sponsored posts and advertisements. The income from these sources varies depending on the number of subscribers and their engagement levels in the channel.
Is Telegram profitable?
No, Telegram is not yet profitable but is generating revenue through Premium subscriptions, in-app purchases, and sponsored messages.
How to make money on Telegram?
You can make money on Telegram by creating channels or groups to sell products, offer paid content, or promote services. Many creators also earn through sponsored posts, affiliate marketing, or by building mini-apps that use Telegramâs in-app currency, Telegram Stars.
In the annals of mobile phone history, Nokia once reigned supreme with its robust devices and iconic brand. However, as the smartphone revolution took hold, Nokia’s fortunes took a sharp turn, leading to a notable decline in its market share and influence. The fall of such a prominent industry leader begs the question: What were the reasons behind Nokia’s failure? What is Nokia’s failure story?
This post focuses on the reasons why Nokia failed after enjoying unrivaled dominance in the mobile segment for several years. The ferocious and mighty telecom giant Nokia was well known for its products’ hardware and battery life. By understanding the lessons from Nokia’s failure story, we can gain valuable insights into the rapidly evolving landscape of the technology industry and the critical importance of adaptation and innovation.
For years, it was the talk of the town. User satisfaction with Nokiaâs mobiles was globally recognized. The company launched the first internet-enabled phone in 1996, and by the start of the millennium, Nokia had also released a touch-screen mobile prototype.
This was the start of a revolution in the mobile phone industry. The Finnish giant was the largest cell phone maker in 1998. Nokia overtook Motorola, a move that was hard to predict. So, what led to the downfall of Nokia? It wasnât a single factor but a myriad of reasons, most of which resulted from Nokia’s resistance to change. We present to you the main reasons behind Nokia’s failure.
In the fast-paced world of technology, companies that fail to adapt to changing trends and consumer demands can quickly find themselves left behind. Nokia, once synonymous with mobile phone supremacy, experienced a significant downfall due to its resistance to smartphone evolution. As competitors embraced the shift towards smartphones, Nokia’s reluctance to fully embrace this revolution became one of the key reasons for its failure.
Nokia failed to take advantage of the Android bandwagon. When mobile phone manufacturers were busy improving and working on their smartphones, Nokia remained stubborn. Samsung soon launched its Android-based range of phones that were cost-effective and user-friendly.
Nokia’s management was under the impression that people wouldnât accept touchscreen phones and would continue with the QWERTY keypad layout. This misapprehension was the start of its downfall. Nokia never considered Android as an advancement and neither wanted to adopt the Android operating system.
After realizing the market trends, Nokia introduced its Symbian operating system, which was used in its smartphones. It faced usability issues and lacked the app support and developer ecosystem that rival platforms like iOS and Android offered. The clunky user experience and limited app selection hampered Nokia’s ability to compete effectively. Also, it was too late by then, with Apple and Samsung having cemented their positions. It was difficult for the Symbian operating system to make any inroads. This is the biggest reason behind Nokia’s downfall.
Nokia was slow to recognize the potential of smartphones and the shift from feature phones to touchscreen devices. They failed to anticipate the demand for devices with advanced capabilities, such as app ecosystems and touch interfaces. This led to a loss of market share to competitors like Apple’s iPhone and Android-based smartphones.
The Deal With Microsoft
Another reason for Nokia’s failure was the ill-timed deal with the tech giant Microsoft. The company sold itself to Microsoft at a time when the software behemoth was fraught with losses.
Nokia’s sales screamed the mobile phone maker’s inability to survive on its own. At the same time, Apple and Samsung were making significant strides in innovation and technological developments.
It was too late for Nokia to adapt to the dynamic and rigorous changes in the market. Microsoftâs acquisition of Nokia is considered to be one of the biggest blunders and wasn’t fruitful for either side.
The partnership limited Nokia’s ability to differentiate itself and left it dependent on Microsoft’s success in the mobile industry. The Windows Phone platform struggled to gain traction, further impacting Nokia’s market position. This case study provides valuable lessons for businesses considering similar alliances and emphasizes the importance of aligning visions, complementary strengths, and adaptable strategies.
Nokia’s Failed Marketing Strategies
Nokia Net Sales Worldwide, 2011-2024
Marketing plays a crucial role in shaping a brand’s success and perception. In the case of Nokia, its decline can be attributed, in part, to failed marketing strategies that hindered its ability to compete effectively in the mobile phone market.
One notable misstep in Nokia’s marketing approach was its unsuccessful implementation of umbrella branding. Companies like Apple and Samsung successfully adopted the umbrella branding model, with flagship products like the iPhone and Samsung Galaxy series acting as the focal point for expanding their product lines. However, Nokia failed to follow suit and capitalize on the umbrella branding strategy, missing out on the opportunity to create a cohesive and recognizable brand identity.
Additionally, Nokia’s marketing efforts struggled to maintain the user trust that the company had built over the years. Inefficient selling and distribution methods further eroded consumer confidence and made it difficult for Nokia to reach its target audience effectively.
While Nokia attempted to regain momentum by introducing hardware and software innovations, these offerings were often late to the market and lacked the uniqueness that would have set them apart from competitors. Rivals had already released similar features and devices, diminishing Nokia’s ability to capture consumers’ attention and regain market share.
The failure of Nokia’s marketing and distribution strategies played a significant role in its ultimate decline and exit from the mobile industry market. Without a strong brand identity, effective distribution channels, and timely innovations, Nokia struggled to compete with rivals who had successfully aligned their marketing strategies with evolving consumer preferences and market dynamics.
Nokia’s failure to keep pace with changing technology and trends played a significant role in its decline. While the company had earned a reputation for its hardware, it didn’t prioritize its software lineup, which proved to be a crucial oversight.
Initially, Nokia was cautious about embracing technical advancements to mitigate the risks associated with introducing innovative features to its phones. However, this approach hindered the company’s ability to adapt to the rapidly evolving market.
The business needed diversification, but it was too late by the time Nokia realized this. Instead of being amongst the early initiators, Nokia transitioned when almost every major brand had already started producing awesome phones.
This case study shows Nokia’s failure to keep up with changing technology and its delayed response to industry trends significantly contributed to its downfall.
Internal Issues in the Company
Internal issues played a significant role in Nokia’s downfall. Frequent disagreements within management on strategy and execution led to uncoordinated efforts and reduced the effectiveness of decision-making.
The company’s once-innovative business culture grew more rigid hampering creativity and slowing its ability to respond to market changes. Continuous leadership changes only deepened internal conflicts.
With shifting strategies and no clear direction, Nokia lost its unified vision, leading to confusion and inefficiency. These internal struggles were a key factor in the companyâs decline.
Overestimation Of Strength
Nokia overestimated its brand value. The company believed that even after the late launch of its smartphones, people would still flock to stores and purchase Nokia-manufactured phones. This turned out to be a misconception, as consumer preferences had shifted towards other brands.
People still make predictions that Nokia will retain the market leadership if it uses better software at its core. However, this is far from the truth, as seen today.
The company got stuck with its software system, which is known to have several bugs and clunks. Nokia felt its previous glory would help alleviate any sort of trouble. Unfortunately, things didnât play out that way.
Unfortunately, the market dynamics had changed, and consumers were no longer willing to overlook the shortcomings of Nokia’s software. Competitors had surpassed Nokia in terms of user experience and software innovation, leaving Nokia struggling to regain its position.
Nokia’s lack of innovation in its products significantly contributed to its failure case study. While brands like Samsung and Apple came up with advanced phones every year, Nokia simply launched the Windows phone with basic features, failing to keep up with the industry’s rapid progress..
The Nokia Lumia series was a jump-start measure, but even that collapsed due to a lack of innovation. The unattractive and dull features didnât help. In the era of 4G, Nokia didnât even have 3G-enabled phones. Nokia also came up with the Asha series, but it was game over by then.
Wrong decisions and risk aversion brought about the decline of the mobile giant. Nokia refrained from adopting the latest tech. Nokia’s failure became a powerful case study that made organizations realize the importance of continuous evolution and enhancements. The journey of what was once the worldâs best mobile phone company to losing it all by 2013 is quite tragic. Nokia’s failure was not solely due to its lack of innovation but also its shortcomings in leadership and guidance. These factors, combined with its inability to adapt to market demands and technological advancements, sealed the company’s fate.
Organizational Restructuring at Nokia
Nokia underwent a sudden and significant organizational shift by adopting a matrix structure driven by enhancing agility within the company. However, this abrupt change resulted in dissatisfaction among stakeholders, particularly as key individuals in top management departed from the organization. These individuals, who had played instrumental roles in establishing Nokia as a leading company, were no longer part of the decision-making process.
The shift to a matrix structure also brought about internal challenges, as stability in top management, a crucial element for organizational coherence, was disrupted. Over just five years, Nokia experienced two CEO replacements, preventing employees from fully adapting to new leadership goals and visions. The frequent leadership changes created instability and hindered consistent strategic direction. The lack of continuity in leadership contributed to employee dissatisfaction and impacted the overall cohesiveness of the organization. Employees and other stakeholders found it challenging to align with successive CEOs, leading to a breakdown in communication and a sense of disconnect within the company.
The Symbian vs. MeeGo OS Dilemma at Nokia
Nokia’s problem arose when its R&D division underwent a split, with one faction dedicated to enhancing the Symbian operating system and the other focused on developing MeeGo. Nokia’s failure story is largely attributed to its outdated OS, as the company stuck with Symbian OS for too long, ignoring the growing dominance of Android and iOS. The competing claims of superiority between the two teams led to internal friction, causing delays in the release of new phones. The company grappled with the challenge of harmonizing divergent technological directions, impacting its ability to bring innovative products to market in a timely manner. This internal competition within the R&D division created a complex dynamic, hindering Nokia’s efficiency and potentially affecting its competitive edge in the rapidly evolving smartphone market.
Nokia’s downfall can be attributed to its failure to analyze market trends and adjust its strategy accordingly. The company neglected the burgeoning smartphone market, ultimately missing a significant opportunity for growth. Rather than capitalizing on this evolving landscape, Nokia could have revitalized its position by enhancing its existing software, such as Symbian. Unfortunately, the lack of strategic foresight and adaptability led to a missed chance to stay competitive in the dynamic tech industry.
Moreover, the oversight in market analysis and strategic planning eroded Nokia’s market share and diminished its relevance in the rapidly changing consumer electronics landscape. The company’s reluctance to pivot and innovate in response to market dynamics ultimately contributed to its decline in the face of evolving consumer preferences and technological advancements.
Poor Strategic Decisions
Nokia’s management made key strategic errors, including underestimating the shift toward lifestyle-driven smartphones like the iPhone and overvaluing the demand for mobile phones and cameras as standalone products. The company was slow to adapt to the growing importance of software ecosystems and app-based user experiences. As competitors embraced innovation, Nokia struggled to keep pace, eventually losing its dominant position in the mobile market.
Summary of Nokia’s Downfall
Cause
Impact
Ignored smartphone trends
Fell behind Apple and Android
Stuck with outdated Symbian OS
User experience lagged behind competitors
Poor leadership decisions
Delayed innovation, weak developer ecosystem
Microsoft partnership (Windows)
Failed to gain traction against Android/iOS
Underestimated importance of apps
Weak app store ecosystem compared to Apple App Store and Google Play
Fragmented product lineup
Confused customers and diluted brand value
Inconsistent marketing
Failed to excite global markets compared to Apple/Samsung hype
Focused on hardware, not software
Missed the shift to integrated software-hardware experiences
Internal bureaucracy
Slowed decision-making and innovation
Failure to attract developers
Limited app ecosystem, especially for Windows Phone platform
Late adoption of touchscreen tech
Competitors set new user expectations
Conclusion
The fall of Nokia company can be attributed to a combination of factors that hindered its ability to adapt, innovate, and stay competitive in the mobile phone market. The resistance to smartphone evolution, missed opportunities, ineffective marketing strategies, and the deal with Microsoft all contributed to its downfall. Ultimately, Nokia’s decline serves as a reminder of the importance of staying agile, embracing change, and continuously evolving to meet consumer demands.
FAQs
Why did Nokia fail?
Not switching to Android, lack of innovation, not upgrading the software, and overestimating the brand value were some of the reasons that led to Nokia’s failure.
What is Nokia?
Nokia is a consumer electronics company popular for its mobile phones. It is one of the largest mobile phone manufacturers in the world.
Is Nokia still around?
Yes, the company is still running, but it has shut down some of its plants.
What happened to Nokia?
Once a dominant force, Nokia clung to outdated software, allowing Android and iOS to surge ahead, leaving the brand lagging. Despite its focus on new technologies, Nokia’s legacy now lives on in the realm of Android.
Why Nokia company failed to compete with Samsung and Apple?
Nokia didn’t adopt Android and focused on its hardware more than its software, which is why it failed to compete against Samsung and Apple.
Are there any new Nokia smartphones coming in the near future?
Though Nokia might seem dominant on the phone front, the company occasionally comes up with some new phones/smartphone devices. Here are some of the Nokia smartphones that are likely to be launched in 2022:
Nokia 2760 Flip 4G
Nokia C21 Plus
Nokia 6.4
Nokia Suzume
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
Nokia C21
Who took over Nokia?
Nokia phones were robust and dependable companions of the pre-smartphone era. However, Nokia’s Java and Windows phones failed to stand out in the market dominated by Apple and Android phones. The Android phone manufacturing companies like Samsung, LG, HTC, Sony, Motorola, and other Chinese smartphone developers like MI, Realme, Oppo, Vivo, and the Apple IOS devices took over Nokia in the mobile sector.
What lessons can other businesses learn from Nokia’s failure?
Nokia’s failure highlights the importance of embracing change, anticipating market trends, and continuously innovating to meet customer expectations. It underscores the need for effective marketing strategies, strategic partnerships, and an unwavering commitment to adaptation and innovation in today’s rapidly evolving business landscape.
Was Nokia’s lack of innovation a significant factor in its decline?
Yes, Nokia’s lack of innovation in its product lineup played a significant role in its downfall. The company failed to keep pace with rivals who consistently introduced advanced devices and embraced evolving market demands, which resulted in Nokia losing its competitive edge.
Why did Nokia fail in India?
Nokia lost its phone industry dominance by sticking to outdated software, missing the smartphone revolution, and experiencing a significant sell-off. Despite not going out of business, Nokia’s cautionary tale highlights the vital role of innovation in a rapidly evolving tech landscape, with the company still present in network tech and patents.
Why Nokia stopped making phones?
Nokia stopped making phones because it failed to keep up with smartphones. It stuck with old software (Symbian), reacted slowly to iPhone and Android, and lost market share. Microsoft bought its phone business in 2014.
If you are an adventurer, a good pair of sneakers is a must for you in your life. The best part is that it can be worn with any kind of clothes that you decide to deck up with. You can never go wrong with sneakers as they are comfortable and stylish enough to lift your style quotient. Sneakers can be worn with almost anything; they are extremely versatile, and the comfort that they provide is unmatched.
When we talk about sneakers, sports shoes, apparel, or sportswear, two prominent brand names ring almost together. They are none other than Nike and Adidas. These two renowned multinational corporations from two different continents – the USA and Europe- have been hot favorites in the category of sneakers and sportswear forever. Almost everyone has an idea or has at least heard of these two brands. Furthermore, growing in the same niche, Nike and Adidas have always been obvious competitors/rivals in their space. Both of them focus on sportswear, and the shoes are what they specialize in. However, over the years, both the US and German sports labels have maintained two recognizable brands around the world. Yes, financially, Nike is known to be much larger than Adidas, but the latterâs performance has been better over recent years.
Both companies have a long history of producing high-quality athletic gear, footwear, and accessories, and have gained a loyal following of customers who appreciate their commitment to innovation, performance, and style. But when it comes to choosing between these two powerhouses, which one comes out on top?
In this blog, we will explore the differences between Adidas and Nike, taking into account factors such as history and growth, technology, business model, plans, and more. Whether you’re a seasoned athlete or just looking for stylish casual wear, this comparison will help you determine which brand (Nike or Adidas) is the better fit for you.
Adidas vs Nike
Comparison Between Nike and Adidas:
Category
Nike
Adidas
Founders
Phil Knight (track athlete) and Bill Bowerman (track coach) in 1964
Adolf Dassler and Rudolf Dassler in 1924 (split in 1949; Adidas by Adolf)
Origin Name
Originally âBlue Ribbon Sportsâ; renamed to Nike in 1971 (named after the Greek goddess of victory)
Originally âDassler Brothers Shoe Factoryâ; renamed to Adidas in 1949
Trademark Tagline
âJust Do Itâ (introduced in 1988)
âImpossible is Nothingâ (launched in 2004)
Brand Image
Youthful, innovative, performance-driven, with a strong celebrity-athlete focus
Classic, sustainability-oriented, comfort and heritage-driven
Product Quality
Known for cutting-edge technology, performance features, and durability
Known for comfort, style, classic appeal, and performance for athletes
Founded in 1964 as Blue Ribbon Sports, officially changed to Nike in 1971.
Founded in 1949 in Germany, became a global brand in the 1970s and 1980s.
Growth
Rapid growth in the 1970s and 1980s with the introduction of innovative technologies such as Air cushioning and the “Just Do It” advertising campaign.
Strong growth in the 1970s and 1980s with the introduction of classic designs and innovative technologies.
Market Expansion
Strong presence in North America and Europe, as well as growing markets in Asia, Africa, and South America.
Strong presence in Europe and North America, as well as growing markets in Asia and South America.
Adidas History and Growth
Adidas is the largest sportswear manufacturer in Europe and the second-largest in the world after Nike. Formerly known as âThe Dassler Brothers Shoe Factoryâ, the company was founded by Adolf Dassler and Rudolf Dassler in 1924. The founders, being sports enthusiasts, began to make sport-oriented shoes that could improve the performance of athletes in any sport.
Later in 1949, the two brothers broke their relationship, which led to the creation of Adidas by Adolf Dassler and Puma by Rudolf, making them the biggest business rivals at that time. Adidas was named after the initials of Adolf Dassler’s while the logo of three stripes was taken on as a shoe design on the companyâs shoes for better comfort.
In the 1970s and 1980s, the company continued to grow with the introduction of innovative technologies and a strong commitment to sustainability. In the 1990s and 2000s, Adidas expanded into international markets and made several acquisitions to further strengthen its position in the sportswear industry.
In 2017, Adidas made an annual revenue of 21 billion euros and had a brand value of 16 billion U.S. dollars in 2024. In the same year, Adidas employed 5,888 people worldwide and generated 50% of its sales in the footwear category. Adidas is much smaller than Nike in terms of what its customers are looking for and trying to find a bigger audience in North America. With their motto âImpossible is nothing,â Adidas’ net revenue as of 2024 is âŹ23.7 billion.
đĄ
Adidas was started by two brothers â Adolf (“Adi”) Dassler and Rudolf Dassler began the company together before splitting; Rudolf went on to create Puma.
Nike History and Growth
Nike is an American multinational company that is the worldâs largest athletic shoe and apparel manufacturer and supplier. Originally known as âBlue Ribbon Sports,â it was founded by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight, who was a track athlete in 1964 before becoming Nike in 1971. The name was taken from Nike, the Greek goddess of victory. The company was first established as a distributor for the Japanese shoemaker Onitsuka Tiger. Bowerman then made his first shoe for Otis Davis, who later went on to win two Olympic gold medals in 1960.
Blue Ribbons Sports sold 1300 pairs of Japanese running shoes with a gross of $8000. Its first advertisement gave its tag name as âThere is no finish line,â which was changed to âJust do itâ in 1988. As per the statistical records of 2024, Nike’s revenue is $51.362 billion and leads the world as the number one brand in the sports business.
Nike experienced rapid growth in the 1970s and 1980s with the introduction of innovative technologies such as Air cushioning, as well as the “Just Do It” advertising campaign. In the 1990s and 2000s, the company continued to grow through international expansion and acquisitions of other brands.
When it comes to Nike, it is the most valuable sports brand in the world, especially in North America. Unlike Adidas, Nike’s first target audience is the people of North America, and they also have strong marketing and sponsorship agreements to back it. Making it the reason behind Nike getting 30.57 billion euros in revenue in 2017. In 2006, however, Nike was still the leader with 13.44 billion euros while Adidas made 10.08 billion euros. In 2015, Nike also won the bet against Adidas and became the next exclusive provider of uniforms to the NBA. Nike’s total global revenues were reported to be $51.36 billion as of 2024.
ZoomX is a cushioning foam developed by Nike that is used to provide lightweight, responsive, and durable cushioning in running shoes.
Boost technology is a cushioning system used in Adidas sneakers to provide energy return and comfort.
Material
ZoomX is a foam material made of a proprietary blend of foam materials.
Boost is made of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) pellets that are fused to form a foam.
Nike Technology
Nike uses lighter materials to make its shoes lightweight, and they are made of polyester, rubber, and cotton. With that, it uses ZoomX technology, so that consumers can experience good speed while running. Nike shoes have holes in their toe cap, which makes them breathable and hygienic for feet as well. Nike shoes provide amazing designs. Nike does make more business than Adidas, but the customer reviews have deteriorated, and there has been no innovation that has been as big as Yeezy’,s which is under Adidas.
Adidas Vs Nike – Comparison between Adidas Ultra Boost and Nike Air VaporMax
Adidas Technology
Adidas always believes in putting quality over quantity and gives more importance to customer satisfaction. Adidas talks to many athletes about their preferences and comfort to implement them into their design. This was the reason for them to innovate Boost technology, which is an innovative cushion technology that includes a TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) that compresses under pressure.
Adidas shoes weighed a little more than Nike shoes. The shoes consist of a full-length midsole and make it feel like a cushion-type material is present while wearing them. It focuses more on comfort and gives out more energy on every single stride. It also provides run-toe padding for its shoe models for comfort. This instantly bounces back to its original form, and in shock prevention, which helps the athlete in a more consistent run. Some of the famous shoes made by Adidas are the Y-3 collection, Ultra Boost, Gazelle, Supernova, etc.
Nike operates on a wholesale model, where it sells its products to retailers, who then sell them to consumers. Nike also sells directly to consumers through its own retail stores and e-commerce platform.
Adidas operates on a mix of wholesale and direct-to-consumer models, where it sells its products through retailers, its retail stores, and its eCommerce platform.
Nike Business Model
Nike is a leading sports apparel manufacturer that has ruled the industry for some decades now. The main focus of Nike has been an aggressive approach toward building strong and promising networks and partnerships with celebrity athletes. To quote an example, the exclusive contract that the company bagged with Michael Jordanwhen the latter signed it in 1984. This grew to be one of the most iconic partnerships in the sportswear industry and has benefited both of them. On one hand, Michael Jordan witnessed tremendous growth in his net worth, and on the other hand, it gave Nike a lead and a total monopoly in the basketball sneaker business. Besides, it also helped increase the overall demand for common stock ownership.
The American sportswear brand has already shifted from traditional media advertising and is hugely focused on social media advertisements and campaigns. Nike concentrates on the athletes who display a high ROI based on their social media profiles. Furthermore, the company chooses the teams that are the most talked about and displays the most engagement based on the core fans on their social media accounts.
Nike has largely focused on digitalization ever since it saw all the growth opportunities it could enjoy there. It has revamped its marketing and products to embrace the ageâs demands. For example, it rolled out the FuelBand, a $150 electronic bracelet, designed to measure a personâs movements throughout the day, whether he/she is engaged in sports, swimming, jogging, or walking. This is a clear nod towards developing a digital force that Nike is aiming for now. One other thing that the company is eyeing is to reduce production costs and make its products environmentally friendly. Flyknit Racer is an exemplary product from Nike in this line.
Nike and Adidas Business Model Comparison
Adidas Business Model
Adidasâs business is inclined towards creating innovative products that are crafted to suit the needs and increasing demands of the consumers. Adidas doesnât believe in forming partnerships and invests less in its product endorsements. Instead, the company is more focused on creating value by building products that are high in performance and are created with an eye on the specific needs of commoners and athletes. Furthermore, it also concentrates on its production rate, the available infrastructures, and the latest technologies that it can adapt, which Adidas constantly re-evaluates and expands. Moreover, the brand also puts efforts intoreducing the complexity on a group level by streamlining the global product range. Consolidating the base of the warehouse and harmonizing above-market service are some other things that Adidas is often involved in.
Adidas aims to deliver the best-branded shopping experiences at all consumer touchpoints. The company has also brought in innovative speed models in the supply chain, which help it respond quickly to consumer needs. These are some of the Adidas strategies that have motivated investors from all around the world to purchase Adidas common stock. Besides, the company has also shown promising growth here for many years now.
Is Nike more successful than Adidas
Marketing/Branding Strategies of Nike and Adidas
Category
Nike
Adidas
Marketing Focus
Nike has a strong focus on sports and fitness and targets athletes and fitness enthusiasts through its marketing campaigns.
Adidas has a similar focus on sports and fitness and targets athletes and fitness enthusiasts. However, it also targets fashion-conscious consumers through collaborations with fashion brands and designers.
Advertising
Nike’s advertising campaigns often feature high-energy, motivational content that focuses on the connection between sports and personal empowerment.
Adidas also uses high-energy, motivational content in its advertising campaigns, but it also highlights the fashion-forward aspect of its products through collaborations with fashion brands and designers.
Marketing/Branding Strategies of Nike
On diving into the marketing strategies of Nike, the first thing that will pop up in your mind is the dominant hold of the market that Nike exercises. The brand believes in maintaining a strong brand image, where it is prominently remembered as a sportswear brand. Nike is capable of pulling it off with the help of numerous smart marketing strategies that the brand implements. Hereâs a quick look at all the key marketing strategies of the brand:
Positioning of Products: Throughout history, Nike has positioned its products with utmost care. For example, it sells âathletic shoesâ for the sportsperson, which helps it capture the niche market easily. Going by the market segmentation of Nike, the company targets athletes, sportspersons, and others who are eager to lead a sporty or healthy lifestyle.
Creative Ability of Storytelling: Nike has heavily relied on its storytelling abilities. The brand, as it was founded by athletes, also has an authentic background or a credible story that backs it up. Yes, Nike founder Bill Bowerman is the person who first implemented this incredible idea of telling real stories. Back then, he was a track and field coach during Nikeâs initial days when Bill wrote stories for his products that helped the company connect with its audiences.
A Focus on Social Media Marketing: As soon as Nike discovered that most of its audience was there on social media platforms, the brand decided to target various social media platforms. This helped Nike witness rapid growth in social media platforms and revenues. Here are some key highlights of the social media strategies: It focuses on user-generated content, Nike works out collaborations with celebrities, the company often engages with the users on social media, Nike attracts influencers and allows them to promote the brand.
Makes for Easy and Hassle-free Purchasing via its Website: Nike has decided to build an easy and effective website that categorizes all the products neatly in an easy-to-use interface. The website of Nike brings out the bold and fearless attitude of Nike users, which Nike boasts of. Nike also has smart product recommendations on its website, which makes it easy for purchasers to make their own decisions.
Loyalty Program: Nike has a loyal group of over 100 million members who have been recorded to have spent 3X more time on their website than the guest buyers. Nike used this data to stress their loyalty programs and has magnified their loyalty programs.
Adidas has rapidly progressed in the past few years by utilizing smart marketing strategies. The brand has notably grown at a rate of 17.6%, thereby adding nearly $5.8 bn since 2015, when compared to Nikeâs addition of $4.3 billion at an average rate of 6.8%. Hereâs a list of all that Adidas leverages, which helps keep the brand ahead of its peers:
Digital Marketing Strategy and Technical Advancements: Adidasâ straightforward digital marketing strategy and its laudable implementation are the power behind its success. A fast-growing eCommerce channel, digital production processes, and the quick adoption of technological advancements help the company gain a considerable amount of revenue, along with helping it engage with its consumers.
The pace of Production: Adidas boasts of its speed of production, which is completely digitalized and empowered with the latest technology of 3d printing and robotics at Speedfactory in Ansbach.
Relationship with the Customers: Adidasâ customer relationship is unparalleled. The company is there on the leading social media channels and keeps a constant engagement alive with its customers.
Commendable Collaborations and Partnerships: Adidas calls in creativity. The company opens its doors and lets out an open call for all the sportsmen and other consumers from all around the world who have a creative bent to collaborate with the brand. The âCalling All Creatorsâ campaign is one illustrious example of such initiatives of the brand. Furthermore, Adidas also collaborates with renowned football players, singers, and athletes to inspire its consumers and target customers.
Strategic Cities of Operation: The cities that Adidas has decided to run its operations in include London, Los Angeles, New York, Paris, Shanghai, and Tokyo, which have been strategically important for its growth.
Adidas Ad
Revenue of Nike and Adidas
Category
Nike
Adidas
Revenue (2024)
$51.36 Billion
$25.53 Billion
Revenue Growth
0.28% YoY
11% YoY
Major Markets
North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific
Europe, North America, and Asia Pacific
Brand Value Comparison of Nike and Adidas Worldwide From 2020 to 2023
Nike Revenue
Nike has bagged in revenues close to $51.36 billion in FY23- 24. Nike has recruited and has over 79,000 employees working for them as of 2024. It is clear that Nike is the biggest sportswear brand and is a market leader to whom most of the other brands operating in the segment look up. Nike has recruited and has over 79,000 employees working for them as of 2024. It is clear that Nike is quite big and is a really strong competitor of brands that deal with sportswear.
đĄ
Fun Fact – Nikeâs headquarters has a running track inside it â True to its roots, Nike’s Oregon campus includes top sports facilities.
Adidas Revenue
Adidas’ revenues have been reported at $25.53 billion in FY23- 24. Adidas has an employee strength of over 62,000, which was last reported in 2024. Adidas is one of the largest players operating in the sportswear segment, giving strong competition to Nike.
Nike operates a mix of in-house and outsourced production, with a majority of its products being manufactured by contract factories in Asia.
Adidas also operates a mix of in-house and outsourced production, with a majority of its products being manufactured by contract factories in Asia.
Suppliers
Nike sources raw materials and components from a network of suppliers worldwide.
Adidas also sources raw materials and components from a network of suppliers worldwide.
Nike Production and Suppliers
Although Nike is an American company, just like its competitor, the shoes are not made in its own country. It has over 523 factories spread in over 41 countries, and shoes and made mostly in China and Vietnam. Chinese manufacturers supply 23% of all Nike production, while Vietnam contributes 16% of Nike’s total production, which mostly consists of creating apparel and footwear.
Adidas Production and Suppliers
All the shoes from the brand Adidas are specially made in China, India, Atlanta, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Turkey, Germany, and Atlanta States. Adidas has over 500 factories in over 55 countries. The majority of shoes are made in countries situated in Asia, like Vietnam, Indonesia, and China. Vietnam produces 44% of all Adidas footwear, followed by Indonesia at 25% and China at 19%.
Cool Factor of Nike and Adidas
Category
Nike
Adidas
Collaborations with Musicians
Nike has collaborated with musicians, including Kendrick Lamar and Drake, on exclusive product collections and marketing campaigns.
Adidas has also collaborated with musicians, including Kanye West and Pharrell Williams, on exclusive product collections and marketing campaigns.
Collaborations with Celebrities
Nike has collaborated with high-profile celebrities, including LeBron James and Serena Williams
Adidas has also collaborated with high-profile celebrities, including James Harden and Kylie Jenner
With athleisure becoming a new trend, Adidas is trying to win the market by this approach. Kanye West is the best example of this because, with the help of Adidas, he has now built a billion-dollar Fashion Empire through his sneaker brand Yeezy.
Michael Jordan with Nike Jordan Sneakers
Nike’s main collaboration till now has been with the basketball veteran Michael Jordan, whose Air Jordan line of trainers holds the top spot for celebrity sneaker brand, generating more than $3 billion in sales every year. But the first Jordans were launched in 1985, which is why it has lost their cool factor. The Celebrities that support Adidas are David Beckham, Pharrell, and Novak Djokovic, while Nike’s supporters are Drake, Roger Federer, Cristiano Ronaldo, etc.
Nike vs Adidas: Sports Sponsorship
Feature
Nike
Adidas
Sports Sponsorships
Nike has a strong presence in the world of sports through sponsorships of high-profile events and teams, including the NFL, NBA, and FIFA World Cup.
Adidas also has a strong presence in the world of sports through sponsorships of high-profile events and teams, including the UEFA Champions League, MLS, and the Olympics.
Athlete Endorsements
Nike has a long history of partnering with high-profile athletes and sports teams to promote its products.
Adidas also has partnerships with high-profile athletes and sports teams to promote its products.
Sports sponsorship has been the main activity of both companies and has a history of being a part of numerous famous sports events. Nike is known to be the main provider of apparel, footwear, and uniforms of the NBA league most of the time.
In 2018, however, Adidas sponsored way more than Nike in the Football World Cup. Where 12 teams wore the brand Adidas, 10 teams signed up for Nike. Adidas boasts the current World Cup holders, Germany, along with Argentina, Spain, Belgium, Colombia, Egypt, Iran, Japan, Mexico, Morocco, Russia, and Sweden.
Both companies have always competed on who will get to sponsor more teams, especially in events like the FIFA World Cup, the Olympics, and NBA basketball games.
Nike has announced plans to become more environmentally sustainable and expand its digital presence, including the use of augmented reality and personalization technology.
Adidas has announced plans to increase its focus on sustainability and to invest in technology and innovation to enhance the consumer experience.
As with previous years, Nike is pivoting on its digital and DTC segments. The company is currently hoping to make 50% of its operations digital by 2025. On the other hand, climate neutrality is one of the primary things that Adidas is currently aiming at. The brand is presently looking to achieve climate neutrality in its operations by 2025 and bring in climate neutrality on a global scale by 2050.
Nike Vs Adidas: The Real Battle
To be specific, there is this timeless battle going on between the best sneaker brands in the world. The battle started in 1976 when Nike hired John Brown and Partners as their advertising agency. Nike emerged with aggressive marketing and took 60% of the athletic shoe market in its grasp. When 1988 Nike started the ‘Just do it‘ campaign, it became one of the best ad slogans of the 20th century.
In recent times, more specifically in 2014, Adidas partnered with Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, who claimed that his Yeezy Boost shoes are way better than Jordan Sneakers. This thing escalated the rivalry as people started leaning towards Yeezy’s.
Adidas Yeezy
The sponsorship battle between the two is another issue. With Nike sponsoring some of the biggest names in the sports category, like Serena Williams, Roger Federer, Tiger Woods, Kobe Bryant, and Lebron James, it has created some noise.
The fight between the two sneaker giants didn’t stop even during COVID-19 when Nike started creating face masks while Adidas created face shields.
Which Is Better Adidas or Nike?
Nike and Adidas are the two heavyweights when it comes to footwear and sports accessories. Regardless of where we come from, most of us are attracted to these brands when it comes to sports accessories, including footwear and more.
Nike certainly has an edge over its archrival Adidas. The former has owned 38.23% of the market share when it comes to sportswear. The advertisements and powerful celebrity endorsements including that of Michael Jordan, help Nike steer past its German counterpart, Adidas, in terms of market share, revenues, and profits. The latter, though owning a lot less of the market share than Nike, is well-revered among the world of its users for its quality and longevity. Founded in 1949, the German brand is one of the oldest operating players in the sportswear industry. However, it is the split between the brothers, Rudolf and Adolf Dassler, of the Dassler Brothers Shoe Factory that resulted in the making of two different brands – Adidas and Puma. This not only divided the brothers and their business for the rest of their lives but also divided the revenues they collected. However, it is also this split of the brothers that gave the world two of the leading brands in the footwear and sportswear industry for the users.
In short, it is subjective to choose between Adidas vs Nike as it depends on personal preference, which brand is better between Nike and Adidas. Both companies have a strong reputation and offer high-quality products. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to determine which brand aligns with their style, comfort, and performance needs.
Adidas has always managed to keep its audience in consideration to design its products undoubtedly, but Nike has always had an upper hand in innovation and design when it comes to the sports market.
What are the differences between Nike and Adidas?
Both Nike and Adidas are major players in the sportswear industry, but they have some distinct differences in terms of design, technology, and brand image. Nike has a reputation for being innovative and heavily focused on performance and technology, while Adidas is known for its classic and iconic designs and a strong focus on sustainability.
Adidas or Nike, which brand offers better quality products?
It is subjective as both Adidas and Nike offer high-quality products. It ultimately depends on personal preference, individual needs, and product type.
Who makes more money Nike or Adidas?
Nike typically generates higher revenue than Adidas. In 2024, Nike’s revenue is approximately US $51.36 billion, while Adidas’s revenue is approximately US $25.53 billion.
What is the Nike brand value?
In 2023, the Nike brand’s worth was $71.6 billion.
Is Nike an American company?
Yes, Nike is an American multinational conglomerate that was founded in Eugene, Oregon, US, on January 25, 1964.
What does Adidas stand for?
The name “Adidas” stands for the abbreviation of the name of Adolf Dassler, the founder of Adidas.
What is the Nike market share?
Speaking of Nike’s market share, the US sports apparel and shoe manufacturing company presently dominates the sportswear with approximately around 38.23% of the market share.
Which brand is more popular, Nike or Adidas?
Nike is typically considered more popular than Adidas. Nike has established itself as a global brand and household name, with a strong presence in sportswear and a reputation for quality products. However, Adidas has also gained significant popularity and recognition, particularly in recent years, and has a loyal customer base. The popularity of these brands can also vary regionally and culturally.
Nike or Adidas which is better?
Choosing between Nike and Adidas depends on what you’re looking for. Nike is known for its innovation, cutting-edge performance gear, and powerful athlete endorsements, making it a favorite among serious athletes and trendsetters. Adidas, on the other hand, stands out for its comfort, sustainability efforts, and timeless style, appealing to both athletes and everyday users. If you prioritize high-tech performance and bold branding, Nike might be better; if you value comfort, eco-friendliness, and classic design, Adidas could be your top pick.