StartupTalky

Tag: Google Play

  • Google Restores Apps Amid Indian Developers Dispute: A Deep Dive into the Conflict

    In a significant turn of events following a tense standoff, tech giant Google has commenced the process of reinstating Indian app developers it delisted from its Play Store on March 1, 2024. 

    The decision to restore certain apps comes amidst a backdrop of heated negotiations, social media discussions, government pressure, and regulatory scrutiny surrounding Google’s billing policies and its implications for Indian startups.

    On March 4, the Indian government called a meeting of the affected Indian app developers and tech behemoth Google to listen to both parties on the ongoing issue.

    The dispute, which erupted over Google’s insistence on its billing system and the imposition of hefty service fees, has sparked widespread concern within the Indian tech ecosystem. 

    On March 1, Google sent shockwaves through the Indian app developer community by removing 10 prominent developers from its Play Store, citing non-payment of service fees. 

    This abrupt action thrust the simmering conflict between Google and Indian app developers into the spotlight, prompting widespread debate and scrutiny over the tech giant’s policies and their impact on the digital ecosystem.

    The affected apps, including Shaadi.com, Bharat Matrimony, Altt (formerly ALTBalaji), Kuku FM, Quack Quack, and others, have long been stalwarts of India’s digital landscape, catering to diverse user needs and preferences.

    “It feels like we will never be able to operate safely if our ecosystem is controlled by them. We need the Indian government to step in and save the startup ecosystem,” KuKu FM’s Co-founder and CEO Lal Chand Bisu said on employment-focused social media platform LinkedIn.

    The crux of the conflict lies in Google’s Play Store policies, particularly its requirement for developers to use the Google Play Billing System (GPBS) and pay commissions ranging from 11% to 26% on in-app purchases. 

    This move follows an order from the fair trade watchdog, Competition Commission of India (CCI), directing Google to revise its earlier system, which charged commissions as high as 30%, deeming it ‘anti-competitive’.

    Despite the CCI’s directives and efforts by affected startups to seek relief through legal channels, Google proceeded with the delisting after the Supreme Court declined to provide interim relief. This unilateral action by Google has raised questions about the fairness of its app marketplace fee and its potential impact on the Indian startup ecosystem.

    Around 30 companies had written a letter to Google, requesting the company not to delist their apps or take any ‘precipitative action’ against them till March 19 as their Special Leave Petition (SLP) comes up for hearing, according to a Times of India report published on Feb 13, 2024

    The app developers had filed the petition against the judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on January 19. The Supreme Court directed the SLP to be listed on March 19 and denied interim relief to startups.

    It has also sparked a debate to develop in-house an indigenous app store that reflects a growing sentiment toward promoting homegrown solutions and reducing dependency on global tech giants like Google. 

    Sridhar Vembu, CEO ZOHO on X

    In response to mounting pressure, Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, intervened to facilitate discussions between Google and the affected app developers. Minister Vaishnaw emphasized the importance of upholding India’s policies and ensuring the protection of its startups in the digital marketplace.

    Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw on Google removing multiple apps from Play Store

    In a rapid response after government intervention, Google has reinstated Info Edge’s array of mobile applications, including popular platforms like Naukri, 99acres, and Shiksha, just one day after they were delisted from the tech giant’s Play Store.

    As per media reports, sources within Google revealed that the restoration of certain apps is contingent upon developers agreeing to comply with Android’s billing options or opting for a consumption-only model. Under the consumption-only model, developers can provide access to paid content without incurring service fees, offering a potential workaround to Google’s billing requirements.

    Anupam Mittal, Founder & CEO at People Group on X

    While the restoration of apps signals a temporary postponement for affected developers, the broader implications of the conflict remain unresolved. 

    The standoff between Google and Indian startups underscores the challenges of navigating the digital landscape, where tech giants wield immense power and influence over distribution channels and revenue streams.

    However, the path to resolution remains fraught with challenges, as stakeholders navigate complex legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations. 

    As discussions between stakeholders continue, there is a growing consensus on the need for greater transparency, fairness, and regulatory oversight in the digital ecosystem. 

    As the saga unfolds, all eyes will be on the outcomes of negotiations and the steps taken by Google, Indian regulators, and app developers to find a resolution that balances innovation, competition, and consumer protection. 

    The outcome of this dispute will not only shape the future of app development and distribution in India but also set a precedent for how tech companies interact with emerging markets and their burgeoning startup ecosystems.

    In the meantime, the March 1 de-listings are a stark reminder of the power dynamics in the digital ecosystem and the importance of advocating for fair and transparent policies that foster a thriving and inclusive tech landscape.

    Industry experts believe that it will be essential for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and the broader community to collaborate and support initiatives aimed at building indigenous solutions. 

    Annual Number of App Downloads From the Google Play Store Worldwide from 2016 to 2022
    Annual Number of App Downloads From the Google Play Store Worldwide from 2016 to 2022

    “PhonePe launched the Indus app store in Q4 2023. But how many are using it? How many have even heard of it? The problem begins with Android and iOS being the major OS and thus having their default app distribution platforms pre-installed on the phones. Any other app distribution platform (such as Indus) cannot be listed on Google Play Store (or iOS Appstore),” replying to Lal Chand Bisu’s post, TopN Analytics Founder Harish Mahale said in his comments on LinkedIn. 

    On February 21, Walmart-owned PhonePe unveiled the Indus Appstore, a new Android app marketplace in India, poised to compete with Google Play and other alternative app stores.

    “Notably, Indus offers Indian developers the freedom to choose any third-party payment gateway for in-app billings, a stark contrast to Google Play’s restrictions. This empowers developers and fosters a more competitive and diverse app marketplace. Embracing the IndusApp Store not only supports local innovation but also challenges monopolistic practices, contributing to India’s digital sovereignty. #IndusAppStore #SupportIndianInnovation #BreakMonopolies,” Ashish Kumar Shaw, State Head at PhonePe said in his comments on social networking site LinkedIn.

    As per recent Indian Mobile App stats for 2024, India has claimed the top spot globally for the highest number of apps installed and actively used each month.

    At present, Google Play serves as the designated app marketplace for the Android operating system, offering users the opportunity to discover and install apps and games developed using the Android software development kit (SDK).

    There are 3,362,451 apps offered for free on Google Play, with an additional 107,095 apps requiring a purchase. However, it’s worth noting that many of the free apps may necessitate subscriptions or include options for in-app purchases.

    Google Removes Apps from Play Store | Mitron and Remove China Apps
    Google removes apps Mitron and Remove China Apps from Google Play Store. 2 rival apps which had posed a challenge to the Chinese apps deleted from app list.
    StartupTalkyAvantika Bhardwaj

  • Fairness or Favoritism? Google’s Spotify Agreement Fuels Antitrust Concerns

    Google has officially acknowledged entering into a unique agreement with Spotify, allowing the music streaming service to bypass the standard Play Store commission fee. This revelation came to light during the ongoing antitrust case between Epic and Google, disclosed by Google’s Head of Global Partnerships, Don Harrison.

    As reported by The Verge, the terms of this arrangement stipulated that Spotify incurred a zero percent commission when users purchased Premium subscriptions through the company’s payment system. In contrast, if a user utilized Google’s payment system, Spotify was obligated to pay a 4 percent commission, significantly lower than Google’s usual 15 percent fee.

    In response to inquiries from the trial judge regarding the Spotify deal, Google asserted that disclosing specific figures would negatively impact ongoing negotiations with other parties. Although Google confirmed the details provided by Harrison, the company sought to rationalize the arrangement by emphasizing that certain developers investing directly in the Android and Play Store ecosystem receive deals that reduce commission fees.

    Harrison further disclosed that Google and Spotify had committed to jointly invest $50 million in a ‘success fund.’ He defended the special agreement by asserting that ensuring the proper functioning of Spotify across play services and core services was crucial for the success of Android phones.

    Introduced the previous year, Google’s User Choice Billing program typically imposed a 15 percent commission on payments made through the Play Store. However, if developers opted for their payment platform, Google offered a 4 percent discount, lowering the commission to approximately 11 percent. Despite this, Google’s VP of Play Partnerships previously acknowledged that, regardless of developers choosing User Choice Billing, they ultimately paid the same amount.

    When questioned about potential similar arrangements with other companies, Google declined to provide further details. Recent revelations indicated that Google had proposed a 10 percent discount to Netflix, which the video streaming platform declined. Consequently, Netflix users are unable to purchase memberships through Android devices.

    Spotify has consistently voiced concerns about in-app purchase fees. In the middle of 2023, the platform took a significant step by discontinuing support for Apple’s App Store billing system, aiming to evade the imposition of a commission as high as 30 percent. Spotify emerged as a prominent participant in the Coalition for App Fairness, a collective that included Epic, and endorsed the antitrust lawsuit initiated by the Fortnite publisher against both Apple and Google. However, in contrast to Epic’s sustained legal pursuit against both tech giants, Spotify seems to have identified a more straightforward and cost-effective resolution to disengage from the legal dispute with Google.

    Epic’s Stand Against Google
    Does Google Favor Big Tech Companies with Lower Commission Fees?

    Epic’s Stand Against Google

    Epic, the developer behind the widely popular mobile game Fortnite, has initiated legal proceedings against Google, alleging that the search giant engages in unlawful price gouging by imposing commissions ranging from 15% to 30% on in-app digital transactions, according to a report by AP.

    In the ongoing antitrust trial, Tim Sweeney, the CEO of Fortnite, testified, asserting that Google Play Store policies are illegitimate and contribute to Google’s monopoly in the mobile app distribution sector, as reported by Bloomberg. Sweeney claimed that Google attempted to sway Epic into releasing Fortnite through the Play Store by presenting a set of financial incentives during a meeting at the California office in 2018. Epic, however, rejected these offers, as stated by AP.

    During his testimony, Sweeney expressed his perception of the situation, stating, “It seemed like a crooked arrangement… Google was proposing a series of side deals, which seemed designed to convince Epic not to compete against them.”

    Does Google Favor Big Tech Companies with Lower Commission Fees?

    Google’s revelation of a unique payment arrangement with Spotify has shed light on the company’s practice of selectively negotiating lower commission fees with certain developers. While Google justifies these deals by emphasizing the investments developers make in the Android ecosystem, critics argue that they create an unfair playing field and disadvantage smaller developers.

    The Spotify deal is particularly controversial given that the company is a member of the Coalition for App Fairness, which is advocating for stricter antitrust regulations against Apple and Google. Spotify’s willingness to engage in a secret deal with Google suggests that the company may be more interested in protecting its interests than promoting fairness in the app market.

    The Epic lawsuit against Google is likely to continue, and the revelations about the Spotify deal could give Epic more ammunition to argue that Google is abusing its monopoly power. It remains to be seen whether Google will be forced to change its policies and allow all developers to pay lower commission fees.

    Everything you need to know about the Epic’s lawsuit against Google
    Epic Games has finally revealed details about its antitrust lawsuit against Google. Keep reading to find out the allegations of Epic Games against Google.
    StartupTalkyPV Vyshnavi