StartupTalky

Tag: CAIT

  • CAIT Demands Luxury Tax be Applied to Online Purchases

    According to reports, the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has demanded that a “luxury tax” be applied to all transactions made through online marketplaces. The traders’ organisation suggested enforcing the levy under the goods and services tax (GST) regime, according to a media report.

    The remarks were made in New Delhi at CAIT’s national colloquium on the subject of “the cruel face of quick commerce and e-commerce”. In order to safeguard the interests of small firms, CAIT’s secretary general emeritus Praveen Khandelwal allegedly advocated for the establishment of new policy mandates to “immediately enforce” FDI laws for the e-commerce sector, especially rapid commerce.

    After careful consideration, the Indian government has nearly finished draughting the e-commerce policy, according to Khandelwal. CAIT believes that in order to protect the nation’s retail democracy, the time has come to enact the e-commerce policy and e-commerce regulations under the Consumer Protection Act.

    Traders Body to Submit Recommendations to Ministries

    The traders’ group declared that it will make suggestions to the ministries of consumer affairs and commerce. These recommendations will highlight the difficulties faced by retail dealers as a result of the fast commerce platforms’ explosive growth.

    CAIT members claimed at the conclave that wealthy rapid commerce platforms are expanding in major cities and using aggressive discounting strategies to corrupt the retail industry. They said that small mom-and-pop store owners are being forced to close as a result of this.

    Khandelwal went on to say that although rapid commerce is a brand-new industry, there is currently no regulatory framework in place. The body asks the government to establish a separate regulatory agency for digital commerce that will oversee both rapid commerce and e-commerce platforms.

     Additionally, CAIT recommended the government outlaw inventory-led online marketplace models. The Centre should also create regulations that guarantee online platforms can only offer products to final consumers through third-party vendors.

    In addition, the trade association stated that its affiliate groups, including the All India Mobile Retailers Association (AIMRA) and the All India Consumer Products Distributors’ Federation (AICPDF), will approach the human rights commission to guarantee the “well-being” of gig workers.

    In order to establish accountability and supervise e-commerce and quick-commerce platforms, CAIT has recommended the establishment of an independent regulatory authority.

    Quick Commerce Changing the Dynamics of Online Shopping

    The development occurs at a time when rapid commerce platforms have revolutionised online shopping in India by establishing new standards for convenience and speed.

    In fiscal year 2023-24 (FY24), the three fast commerce majors—Zomato-owned Blinkit, Swiggy Instamart, and Zepto—recorded a combined top line of $1 billion. While Amazon, Nykaa, and Myntra are also testing similar products, e-commerce powerhouse Flipkart also entered the rapid commerce space last year with Minutes.

  • CAIT Claims Quick Commerce Platforms Violate Competition Law and FDI Standards

    On 13 November, the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) accused rapid commerce platforms of breaking a number of national laws, such as the Competition Act, the Consumer Protection Act, and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) regulations.

    The trade group stated in a white paper that more than INR 54,000 crore in foreign direct investment (FDI) funds have been given to the nation’s top three rapid commerce platforms: Zepto, Swiggy’s Instamart, and Blinkit, which is owned by Zomato.  Just INR 1,300 crore, or 2.5%, of this has gone towards the creation of tangible assets. According to the report, operating losses brought on by predatory pricing practices may have accounted for more than half of the foreign direct investment.

    It further stated that this is against FDI standards, which were designed to promote long-term growth through the development of infrastructure and assets. 

    Since retail trade is a state matter, CAIT will distribute copies of this white paper to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, the Competition Commission of India, and the chief ministers of every state, according to CAIT secretary general Praveen Khandelwal.

    Ignoring FDI Norms

    According to the CAIT’s research, these platforms use a “closed nexus of preferred sellers,” which is against the FDI standards and acts. The CAIT claimed that FDI regulations specifically forbid foreign-backed marketplaces from controlling or holding inventory.

     Additionally, the trade group has asserted that these quick-commerce platforms restrict market access by predatory pricing, deep discounting, and exclusive agreements with specific suppliers, all of which are violations of the Competition Act. According to the report, they are driving small retailers and kirana shops out of the market by giving chosen vendors free or drastically reduced storage and delivery services. 

    CAIT claims that Blinkit uses five major vendors, including Superwell Comtrade, TAMS Global, and Kemexel Ecommerce. Among other companies, Swiggy Insatmart depends on PYD Retail, Bhagwati Stores, Getmax Globe, and FOCLO Technologies. As an inventory-based e-commerce company, Zepto, on the other hand, directly supplies products, completely avoiding third-party vendors.

    Vertical Agreement With Preferred Players

    According to the white paper, these platforms have vertical agreements with their favoured vendors, giving them complete control over price, distribution, storage, production, and supply. This restricts consumer options, affects purchase costs, and hinders independent sellers’ access to the market. Furthermore, it asserts that the platforms are violating the Consumer Protection Act by not giving customers clear information about the merchants. According to the trade group, these activities are putting the livelihoods of 3 crore kirana shopkeepers in jeopardy and forcing over 25% of them to close. 

     The white paper was released at a time when regulators are looking more closely at platforms for quick commerce. The Food Safety & Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) requested on 12 November that operators of e-commerce and quick-commerce food businesses guarantee a minimum shelf life of 30% or 45 days prior to product expiration at the time of delivery to customers. The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) also sent notices to e-commerce and quick commerce companies last month for violating the Legal Metrology Packaged Commodity Rules (PCR) 2017 by failing to display the MRP and “best-before” dates for perishable goods on their platforms.

    Ola Electric in Hot Water: Consumer Body Calls for Investigation
    A consumer watchdog urges investigation into complaints about Ola Electric, highlighting rising concerns around product and service issues.
    StartupTalkyNitin Konde