Tag: AI Model

  • Monetizing AI: Business Models That Work (And Those That Don’t)

    This article has been contributed by Nida Sahar, CEO, Nife.io.

    In 2017, a small AI startup had what seemed like an unbeatable product: a powerful deep-learning model that could generate human-like text. Investors were excited, the demo was impressive, and the hype was real. But there was a major challenge—they had no clear monetization strategy. 

    After months of experimentation, they launched a subscription product, but user churn was high. They then attempted to license their model to enterprises, but the sales cycle was too slow. Finally, they pivoted to an API model, which allowed them to scale revenue quickly. 

    That startup was OpenAI. 

    Their journey reflects a challenge every AI company faces: Having powerful technology is not enough—without the right business model, even the most advanced AI products will fail. 

    Three Proven AI Monetization Strategies 

    AI startups typically choose among three primary monetization strategies, each with advantages and challenges. 

    1. Subscription-Based AI: The SaaS Model 

    A common approach to AI applications is the subscription-based SaaS model. Whether it’s an AI-powered tool for marketing, automation, or data analysis, many companies opt to charge users a monthly or annual subscription. 

    When Subscription Works Best 

    • The product provides continuous value (e.g., Grammarly enhances writing daily).
    • A freemium-to-premium conversion strategy is effective (Jasper AI monetized free users by offering premium marketing features). 
    • The target audience consists of individuals or small businesses that are unlikely to commit to enterprise contracts. 

    Challenges of Subscription AI 

    • High churn rates: If users do not perceive ongoing value, retention becomes difficult.
    • Customer acquisition costs: Scaling an AI SaaS product requires significant investment in marketing and customer education.
    • Compute costs: AI-driven SaaS products often have higher infrastructure costs than traditional SaaS, which can eat into margins. 

    Case Study: Grammarly & Jasper AI 

    Grammarly successfully leveraged the freemium model, allowing users to test the product before upgrading to paid plans. Jasper AI found a profitable niche in marketing, charging users based on AI-generated content

    Both succeeded because they solved a specific, recurring pain point rather than simply offering an interesting AI feature. 

    2. API-Based AI: The Developer-Focused Approach 

    Instead of building an end-user application, some AI startups monetize by offering API access to their models, allowing developers and businesses to integrate AI into their own products. 

    When APIs Work Best 

    • Developers need off-the-shelf AI without the cost of in-house development. ● The AI model is expensive to build but relatively cheap to scale (Deepgram optimized infrastructure to make speech recognition cost-effective). 
    • Enterprises prefer usage-based pricing over fixed subscriptions. 

    Challenges of API Monetization 

    • Cloud costs can escalate if you don’t carefully structure pricing; usage growth can lead to unsustainable infrastructure costs. 
    • Commoditization risk: Open-source alternatives and competitors can drive prices down, leading to a race to the bottom

    Case Study: OpenAI & Deepgram 

    OpenAI successfully implemented pay-per-use pricing, which allowed it to generate significant revenue while maintaining accessibility. Deepgram positioned itself as a cost-effective alternative to major cloud providers by optimizing infrastructure and pricing aggressively. 

    APIs are scalable, but success depends on controlling costs and maintaining differentiation in a competitive market. 

    3. Enterprise AI: Selling to Large Organizations 

    Enterprise AI focuses on selling AI solutions directly to businesses, often through customized deployments or large-scale integrations. This model is common in industries like finance, healthcare, cybersecurity, and government contracting.

    When Enterprise AI Works Best 

    • The AI product solves a critical business problem that organizations cannot solve internally (e.g., Palantir provides intelligence solutions to government agencies).
    • Customers require custom AI models that are not easily replaced by off-the-shelf solutions. 
    • The company has the resources to withstand long sales cycles (often 12+ months).

    Challenges of Enterprise AI 

    • Sales cycles are long: Closing enterprise deals can take a year or more, creating cash flow challenges for early-stage startups. 
    • Customer acquisition requires direct sales efforts, which can be expensive and complex. 
    • Procurement processes are slow and bureaucratic, making it difficult to scale quickly. Case Study: Palantir & C3.ai 

    Palantir built a successful AI business by securing large government contracts before expanding into the private sector. C3.ai focused on industry-specific AI applications, such as energy and supply chain optimization, allowing them to differentiate from general-purpose AI platforms. 

    Enterprise AI can be highly profitable, but it requires significant capital, patience, and a strong sales team


    Top Trends in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Shaping Business in 2025
    Explore the latest trends in artificial intelligence (AI) for business, from automation and predictive analytics to AI-driven customer experiences and innovation.


    What Doesn’t Work? 

    While some AI business models have proven successful, others have consistently failed.

    1. “Cool Tech Without a Business Model” 

    Many AI startups focus too much on research and product development without a clear go-to-market strategy. Having a high-performing model is not enough; it needs to be packaged, priced, and distributed effectively

    2. “Subscription Models with High Churn” 

    If users do not see continuous value from an AI product, they will cancel their subscriptions quickly. AI tools that are used sporadically or fail to integrate into users’ workflows often struggle to retain customers. 

    3. “APIs Without Pricing Control”

    APIs can be profitable, but only if usage-based pricing accounts for infrastructure costs. If an API model scales usage without sufficient margins, the company can end up losing money as it grows. 

    4. “Enterprise AI Without Sufficient Funding” 

    Many startups attempt to sell AI to enterprises without realizing how long and expensive the process is. Without strong financial backing, these companies often run out of capital before closing enough deals to sustain operations. 

    Pricing AI Products: Key Strategies 

    Selecting the right pricing model is critical for AI monetization. The most successful companies use one or a combination of the following approaches: 

    1. Usage-Based Pricing (Best for APIs & Enterprise AI) 

    • Charges customers per API call, token processed, or data analyzed.
    • Example: OpenAI’s pricing scales based on usage. 

    2. Tiered Subscription Pricing (Best for SaaS AI) 

    • Offers multiple pricing plans based on feature access or limits. 
    • Example: Jasper AI charges higher fees for businesses, generating more AI content. 

    3. Freemium-to-Paid Conversion (Best for Consumer AI) 

    • Provides free access to basic features, with paid upgrades for advanced functionality.
    • Example: Grammarly’s free version drives user adoption before upselling premium features. 

    4. Enterprise Licensing (Best for B2B AI) 

    • Companies sell AI solutions as a one-time license or an annual contract.
    • Example: Palantir’s multi-million-dollar government contracts. 

    Key Takeaways for AI Founders and Investors 

    • Subscription AI can work, but retention is critical. 
    • API-first models scale quickly, but pricing and cloud costs must be managed carefully.
    • Enterprise AI is lucrative but requires capital, patience, and strong sales execution. 
    • A hybrid approach often provides the most stability and scalability. What’s Your Strategy? 

    The AI market is exploding, but monetization remains a major challenge. The most successful AI companies are not necessarily those with the best technology, but those that have a well-defined business model and execution plan. 

    For AI founders, the key question is not just, “What can we build?” but “How will we sell it?”.


    Cloud Security in the Age of AI: Adapting to Evolving Threats
    Explore the impact of cloud security in the age of AI and how evolving threats are reshaping business and consumer interactions. Learn how to adapt to new challenges.


  • Alibaba Introduces a New AI Model and Says It Beats DeepSeek and GPT-4o

    According to a news agency, Chinese internet giant Alibaba on 29 January unveiled an updated version of its Qwen 2.5 artificial intelligence model, which it said outperformed the much-lauded DeepSeek-V3. The Qwen 2.5-Max’s odd release date—the first day of the Lunar New Year, when the majority of Chinese are off from work and spending time with their families—indicates how much pressure DeepSeek’s explosive growth over the last three weeks has put on both its domestic and international competitors.

    Alibaba’s cloud unit released a statement on its official WeChat account stating that “Qwen 2.5-Max outperforms… almost across the board GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3, and Llama-3.1-405B,” alluding to the most cutting-edge open-source AI models from OpenAI and Meta. Alibaba has invested heavily in its cloud services division with Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Baidu Inc., and it is in a fierce competition to hire Chinese AI developers to utilise its tools.

    Locking Horns with Set Players

    This week, the 20-month-old startup DeepSeek, which was established in Hangzhou, Alibaba‘s hometown, rocked US tech companies. Alibaba Cloud also disclosed results indicating that, in some benchmarks, its AI outperforms OpenAI’s and Anthropic’s models.

    In an effort to attract more customers, cloud service providers like Tencent and Alibaba have recently lowered their prices. Along with six other promising AI businesses in China that have raised money at unicorn values, DeepSeek has already participated in that pricing war.

    Comparing DeepSeek with Domestic Rivals

    When DeepSeek‘s V3 model’s predecessor, DeepSeek-V2, came out in May of last year, it set off a pricing war for AI models in China. Alibaba’s cloud division announced price reductions of up to 97% on a variety of models due to DeepSeek-V2’s open-source nature and historically low cost of just 1 yuan ($0.14) for 1 million tokens, or units of data processed by the AI model.

    Other Chinese tech giants followed suit, such as Tencent, the most valuable internet company in the nation, and Baidu (9888.HK), which launched China’s first ChatGPT-like app in March 2023. In a rare interview with Chinese media site Waves in July, Liang Wenfeng, the mysterious creator of DeepSeek, stated that the company “did not care” about price wars and that its primary objective was to achieve artificial general intelligence, or AGI.

    AGI is defined by OpenAI as autonomous systems that outperform humans in the majority of economically significant tasks. Young graduates and PhD students from prestigious Chinese universities make up the majority of DeepSeek’s workforce, which functions more like a research lab than the hundreds of thousands of workers employed by major Chinese internet businesses like Alibaba.

    Liang contrasted DeepSeek’s lean operations and flexible management style with the exorbitant costs and top-down structures of China’s major tech companies, saying in his July interview that he thought they might not be well suited to the future of the AI business. Liang went on to say that IT giants’ skills have their limits and that large foundational models require ongoing innovation.


    MeitY Seeks Ideas for India’s AI Foundation Paradigm
    MeitY invites proposals to create India’s own AI foundation paradigm, encouraging innovative ideas for a robust and future-ready artificial intelligence framework.


  • Meta Launches Largest Llama 3 AI Model, Citing Language and Math Advancements

    On Tuesday, Meta Platforms (META.O) unveiled the most recent version of its Llama 3 AI models, which are primarily available for free. These models compete with paid models from competitors like OpenAI and offer superior multilingual skills and general performance metrics.

    Announcing the release of the new Llama 3 model, the parent company of Facebook stated in blog posts and a research study that it can talk in eight languages, produce higher-quality computer code, and solve more complicated math problems than earlier versions.

    Although it is still smaller than top models supplied by competitors, this new version outshines the previous one with 405 billion parameters, or variables, that the algorithm considers to produce answers to user questions.

    During his extensive promotion of Llama 3, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated he expects that the future Llama models will surpass proprietary competition by the end of next year. He claimed that hundreds of millions of people were already using the Meta AI chatbot, which was driven by those models, and that it was on course to become the most popular AI assistant by the end of the year.

    Competition Is Getting Stiffer

    The release aligns with the ongoing competition among technology companies to demonstrate that their expanding portfolios of resource-intensive large language models can generate substantial improvements in well-established problem areas, such as advanced reasoning, to justify the substantial investments they have made in them.

    According to Meta’s leading AI scientist, these models will eventually run into reasoning limitations, necessitating the development of new AI systems.

    Amazon is reportedly working on a model with two trillion parameters, whereas OpenAI’s GPT-4 model reportedly has one trillion.

    Meta announced that it is updating its flagship 405 billion parameter model as well as its 8 billion and 70 billion parameter Llama 3 models, which debuted in the spring but are reduced in weight, with new versions coming out soon.

    Meta has announced that it will be releasing revised versions of its flagship 405 billion parameter model, as well as its 8 billion and 70 billion parameter Llama 3 models, which debuted in the spring. The models are lighter in weight.

    With an expanded “context window,” the three new models can handle larger user requests and are multilingual.

    Benefits Llama offers to its users

    Meta makes its Llama models available to developers for little or no cost, an approach that Zuckerberg claims will lead to better products, less reliance on potential rivals, and higher engagement with the company’s primary social networks.

    If developers choose the company’s free models over its paid ones, it would hurt its competitors’ business models and benefit the company too. Meta highlighted potential improvements in important mathematics and knowledge exams in its announcement, which may increase the attraction of that possibility.


    How to Use Meta Business Suite for Effective Management
    Meta Business Suite is designed to help businesses manage their presence on Facebook and Instagram. Learn what it is and how to use it.